Michden Family Trust v The Acting Provincial Head: Mpumalanga Department of Water And Sanitation (WT05/17/MP) [2021] ZAWT 4 (28 June 2021)
The Tribunal found that the appellant had engaged in the verification process set out in Section 35 of the National Water Act, resulting in confirmation of existing lawful water use by the responsible authority in 2016. The respondent's directive was issued more than a year after this confirmation and failed to follow the verification procedure required by the Act. The Tribunal held that the Act does not require identification of a specific water resource for lawful water use, and the evidence, including expert testimony and documentary records, established that the appellant had existing lawful water use, including abstraction from the Damara River. The withdrawal of confirmation was...
- Citation
- [2021] ZAWT 4
- Parties
- Appellant: Michden Family Trust; Respondent: The Acting Provincial Head: Mpumalanga Department of Water and Sanitation
- Court
- Water Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 28 June 2021
- Case Number
- WT05/17/MP
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Directive Issued Under Section 53(1) of the National Water Act
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld. Directive and withdrawal of confirmation set aside. Appellant's existing lawful water use recognised, including abstraction from Damara River and storage of water.
- Judges
- L Mbanjwa
- Legal Topics
- National Water Act, Existing Lawful Water Use, Verification of Water Use, Administrative Action, Rectification of Contravention
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michden Family Trust
Appellant
The Acting Provincial Head: Mpumalanga Department of Water and Sanitation
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Directive Issued Under Section 53(1) of the National Water Act
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant's water use from the Damara River constitutes an existing lawful water use under the National Water Act.
- 2 Whether the respondent's directive and subsequent withdrawal of confirmation of lawful water use were valid administrative actions.
- 3 Whether identification of a specific water resource is required for lawful water use under the Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the appellant had engaged in the verification process set out in Section 35 of the National Water Act, resulting in confirmation of existing lawful water use by the responsible authority in 2016. The respondent's directive was issued more than a year after this confirmation and failed to follow the verification procedure required by the Act. The Tribunal held that the Act does not require identification of a specific water resource for lawful water use, and the evidence, including expert testimony and documentary records, established that the appellant had existing lawful water use, including abstraction from the Damara River. The withdrawal of confirmation was...
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld. Directive and withdrawal of confirmation set aside. Appellant's existing lawful water use recognised, including abstraction from Damara River and storage of water.
Orders
- Respondent's Directive in terms of Section 53(1) of the National Water Act dated 11 September 2017 is set aside.
- Respondent's Notice of Intention to Withdraw confirmation of existing lawful water use on Farm But-An-Ben 586 L Portion O and the subsequent withdrawal are set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment