Midiro Civils and Construction CC and Another v Engineerex (Pty) Ltd and Another (HCAA03/2024 ; A5472/2018) [2025] ZALMPPHC 46 (14 March 2025)
The court held that the Engineer is contractually bound to issue a payment certificate within seven days of receiving the Contractor's monthly statement, regardless of the extent of work performed. The process for raising dissatisfaction is clearly set out in the contract, allowing the Employer to object only after certification. The court a quo erred in finding that the relief sought negated the contract and in treating certification as a jurisdictional requirement for payment. The issuance of the payment certificate is a prerequisite for the Contractor to submit an invoice and for the Employer to pay. The appeal was upheld, and the Engineer was ordered to issue the payment certificate...
- Citation
- [2025] ZALMPPHC 46
- Parties
- Appellant: Midiro Civils and Construction CC; Appellant: Lebaka Construction (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Engineerex (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Collins Chabane Local Municipality
- Court
- Limpopo High Court, Polokwane
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 14 March 2025
- Case Number
- HCAA03/2024 ; A5472/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Order of Court a Quo
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; order of court a quo set aside and replaced.
- Judges
- Ngobeni, G. Muller, M. Makoti
- Legal Topics
- Specific Performance, Construction Contracts, Payment Certification, Contractual Obligations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Midiro Civils and Construction CC
Appellant
Lebaka Construction (Pty) Ltd
Appellant
Engineerex (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Collins Chabane Local Municipality
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Order of Court a Quo
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Engineer is obliged to issue a payment certificate after receipt of the Contractor's monthly statement, regardless of the extent of work performed.
- 2 Whether the court a quo erred in finding that the relief sought negates the contract provisions.
- 3 Whether the certification process is a jurisdictional requirement for payment under the contract.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the Engineer is contractually bound to issue a payment certificate within seven days of receiving the Contractor's monthly statement, regardless of the extent of work performed. The process for raising dissatisfaction is clearly set out in the contract, allowing the Employer to object only after certification. The court a quo erred in finding that the relief sought negated the contract and in treating certification as a jurisdictional requirement for payment. The issuance of the payment certificate is a prerequisite for the Contractor to submit an invoice and for the Employer to pay. The appeal was upheld, and the Engineer was ordered to issue the payment certificate...
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; order of court a quo set aside and replaced.
Orders
- Engineerex (PTY) LTD (First Respondent) is ordered to issue a signed payment certificate number 15 to the Employer (Second Respondent) and the Contractor or JV (First and Second Appellants) for the amount the Engineer considers due, within seven days of this order.
- The Contractor shall submit the tax invoice, if required by law, to the Employer for payment as required by clause 6.10.4 of the GCC.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment