Miele ET CIE Gmbh & Co v Euro Electrical (Pty) Ltd. (1/88) [1988] ZASCA 1; [1988] 2 All SA 244 (A) (1 November 1987)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that Euro Electrical's continued use of the trade name 'Miele' or 'Miele Appliances' after the cancellation of the distributorship agreement constituted unauthorized use of Miele's registered trade marks in the course of trade, otherwise than as a trade mark, in relation to goods for which the trade mark is registered. The court found that such use was likely to convey to the public an association between Euro Electrical and Miele, thereby prejudicing Miele by placing its reputation and goodwill in the hands of a party over whom it had no control. The court concluded that all requirements for infringement under section 44(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Act were...
- Citation
- [1988] ZASCA 1
- Parties
- Appellant: Miele ET CIE GmbH & CO; Respondent: Euro Electrical (Proprietary) Limited
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 1 November 1987
- Case Number
- 1/88
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Dismissal of Application for Interdict in the Transvaal Provincial Division
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed. The order of the court a quo is set aside and replaced with an interdict restraining Euro Electrical from infringing Miele's registered trade marks.
- Judges
- Corbett, Botha, Smalberger, Vivibr, Nicholas
- Legal Topics
- Trade Mark Infringement, Unauthorized Use of Mark, Likelihood of Confusion, Injury or Prejudice, Trade Name Usage
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Miele ET CIE GmbH & CO
Appellant
Euro Electrical (Proprietary) Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Dismissal of Application for Interdict in the Transvaal Provincial Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Euro Electrical's continued use of the trade name 'Miele' or 'Miele Appliances' after cancellation of the distributorship agreement constitutes infringement of Miele's registered trade marks under section 44(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Act.
- 2 Whether such use was unauthorized, in the course of trade, otherwise than as a trade mark, in relation to goods for which the trade mark is registered, and likely to cause injury or prejudice to Miele.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that Euro Electrical's continued use of the trade name 'Miele' or 'Miele Appliances' after the cancellation of the distributorship agreement constituted unauthorized use of Miele's registered trade marks in the course of trade, otherwise than as a trade mark, in relation to goods for which the trade mark is registered. The court found that such use was likely to convey to the public an association between Euro Electrical and Miele, thereby prejudicing Miele by placing its reputation and goodwill in the hands of a party over whom it had no control. The court concluded that all requirements for infringement under section 44(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Act were...
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed. The order of the court a quo is set aside and replaced with an interdict restraining Euro Electrical from infringing Miele's registered trade marks.
Orders
- The respondent, its agents and servants are interdicted and restrained from infringing the applicant's registered trade marks Nos B72/3689, B72/3690, B72/3691, B72/3692, B78/3272, B78/3273, B78/3274 and B78/3275 in terms of section 44(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Act No 62 of 1963, by using the names 'Miele Appliances'...
- The respondent is ordered to pay the costs of the application, including the costs of two counsel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment