Mineral-Loy (Pty) Ltd v Highveld Steel and Vanadium Limited and Others (34321/10) [2021] ZAGPPHC 157 (4 March 2021)
The court found that, after considering all submissions, the applicant satisfied the requirements of section 17(1)(a) of the Superior Courts Act regarding prospects of success on appeal. Therefore, leave to appeal was granted. The appeal against both the costs order and the reconsideration order is to be heard by...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] ZAGPPHC 157
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Mineral-Loy (Pty) Ltd; Defendant: Highveld Steel & Vanadium Corporation Ltd Steel and Vanadium Limited; Defendant: Transalloys (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Case Number
- 34321/10
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Costs Order and Reconsideration Order
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted. Costs are costs in the appeal.
- Judges
- AC Basson
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Costs Order, Rule 34 12, Prospects of Success
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mineral-Loy (Pty) Ltd
Plaintiff
Highveld Steel & Vanadium Corporation Ltd Steel and Vanadium Limited
Defendant
Transalloys (Pty) Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Costs Order and Reconsideration Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has satisfied the requirements for leave to appeal under section 17(1)(a) of the Superior Courts Act.
- 2 Whether there are reasonable prospects of success on appeal regarding the costs order and the reconsideration order.
- 3 Whether the appeal should be heard by the Full Court of the Division.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, after considering all submissions, the applicant satisfied the requirements of section 17(1)(a) of the Superior Courts Act regarding prospects of success on appeal. Therefore, leave to appeal was granted. The appeal against both the costs order and the reconsideration order is to be heard by the Full Court of the Division. Costs are to be costs in the appeal.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted. Costs are costs in the appeal.
Orders
- Leave to appeal is granted.
- The appeal against the costs order made in the judgment handed down on 27 January 2020 and the appeal against the order for reconsideration of the costs order handed down on 2 November 2020 shall be heard by the Full Court of this Division.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
45 paragraphs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA
Case no: 34321/10
REPORTABLE: NO
OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES:NO
REVISED
In the matter between:
MINERAL-LOY (PTY) LTD
Plaintiff
(Respondent in the application for leave to appeal)
and
HIGHVELD STEEL & VANADIUM CORPORATION
LTD STEEL AND VANADIUM LIMITED
First Defendant
TRANSALLOYS (PTY) LTD
Second Defendant
(Applicant in the application for leave to appeal)
JUDGMENT
AC BASSON, J
[1] The defendant (applicant in the application for leave to appeal) seeks leave to appeal both against the costs order (as handed down on 27 January 2020) and the finding in the application for reconsideration of the costs order in terms of Rule 34(12) (as handed down on 30 October 2020).
[2] The grounds for leave to appeal have been fully ventilated in both parties’ heads of argument.
[3] Section 17(1) of the Superior Courts Act (“the Act”)[1] provides that leave to appeal may only be granted where the Judge or Judges concerned are of the opinion that —
“(a) ….
(i) the appeal would have a reasonable prospect of success; or
(ii) there is some other compelling reason why the appeal should be heard, including conflicting judgments on the matter under consideration”
[4] I am, after having considered all the submissions, persuaded that the defendant (applicant) has satisfied the requirements of section
17(1)(a) of the Act regarding the prospects of success on appeal. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal is granted. Costs are costs in the appeal.
[5] It is further ordered that the appeal against the costs order made in the judgment handed down on 27 January 2020 and the appeal against the order for a re-consideration of the costs order handed down on 2 November 2020 be heard by the same court (the Full Court of this Division).
Delivered: This judgment was prepared and authored by the Judge whose name is reflected and is handed down electronically by circulation to the Parties/their legal representatives by email and by uploading it to the electronic file of this matter on CaseLines. The date for hand-down is deemed to be 4 March 2021.
________________________________
A.C. BASSON
JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT
GAUTENG DIVISION OF THE HIGH COURT, PRETORIA
Electronically submitted therefore unsigned
Appearances
For the plaintiff / respondent: Adv G Kairinos SC
Adv A Schluep
Instructed by:
Andrew Duff Attorneys
For the defendant / applicant:
Adv J Daniels SC
Adv CT Vetter
Instructed by:
Mervyn Taback Inc
[1] Act 10 of 2013.