Mineral-Loy (Pty) Ltd v Highveld Steel and Vanadium Limited and Others (34321/10) [2021] ZAGPPHC 157 (4 March 2021)

Mineral-Loy (Pty) Ltd v Highveld Steel and Vanadium Limited and Others (34321/10) [2021] ZAGPPHC 157 (4 March 2021)

The court found that, after considering all submissions, the applicant satisfied the requirements of section 17(1)(a) of the Superior Courts Act regarding prospects of success on appeal. Therefore, leave to appeal was granted. The appeal against both the costs order and the reconsideration order is to be heard by...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] ZAGPPHC 157
Parties
Plaintiff: Mineral-Loy (Pty) Ltd; Defendant: Highveld Steel & Vanadium Corporation Ltd Steel and Vanadium Limited; Defendant: Transalloys (Pty) Ltd
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Case Number
34321/10
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Costs Order and Reconsideration Order
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted. Costs are costs in the appeal.
Judges
AC Basson
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Costs Order, Rule 34 12, Prospects of Success
Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Costs Order Rule 34 12 Prospects of Success

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mineral-Loy (Pty) Ltd

Plaintiff

Highveld Steel & Vanadium Corporation Ltd Steel and Vanadium Limited

Defendant

Transalloys (Pty) Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Costs Order and Reconsideration Order

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has satisfied the requirements for leave to appeal under section 17(1)(a) of the Superior Courts Act.
  2. 2 Whether there are reasonable prospects of success on appeal regarding the costs order and the reconsideration order.
  3. 3 Whether the appeal should be heard by the Full Court of the Division.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, after considering all submissions, the applicant satisfied the requirements of section 17(1)(a) of the Superior Courts Act regarding prospects of success on appeal. Therefore, leave to appeal was granted. The appeal against both the costs order and the reconsideration order is to be heard by the Full Court of the Division. Costs are to be costs in the appeal.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted. Costs are costs in the appeal.

Orders

  • Leave to appeal is granted.
  • The appeal against the costs order made in the judgment handed down on 27 January 2020 and the appeal against the order for reconsideration of the costs order handed down on 2 November 2020 shall be heard by the Full Court of this Division.