Minister for Justice and Constitutional Development v Chonco and Others (159/08) [2009] ZASCA 31; 2009 (6) SA 1 (SCA) ; [2009] 3 All SA 149 (SCA) (30 March 2009)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the Minister for Justice and Constitutional Development has a constitutional obligation to process applications for presidential pardon and to do what is necessary to enable the President to exercise his powers under section 84(2)(j) of the Constitution in an informed manner. The preparatory steps required for the President to make a decision on pardons are executive functions that fall within the ambit of section 85(2)(e) of the Constitution and are the responsibility of the relevant department. The Minister's failure to perform these functions constitutes a breach of section 92(3)(a) and section 237 of the Constitution. The court rejected the...
- Citation
- [2009] ZASCA 31
- Parties
- Appellant: Minister for Justice and Constitutional Development; Respondent: Mqabukeni Chonco and 383 Others
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 30 March 2009
- Case Number
- 159/08
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court, Pretoria
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs, including costs occasioned by the employment of two counsel.
- Judges
- Farlam, Nugent, Van Heerden, Jafta, Mlambo
- Legal Topics
- Presidential Pardon, Constitutional Obligations, Executive Functions, Section 84 2 J, Section 237, Ministerial Duties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Minister for Justice and Constitutional Development
Appellant
Mqabukeni Chonco and 383 Others
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court, Pretoria
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Minister for Justice and Constitutional Development is under a constitutional obligation to process applications for presidential pardon before the President exercises his power under section 84(2)(j) of the Constitution.
- 2 Whether the delay in processing the applications constitutes a breach of constitutional obligations under section 237.
- 3 Whether the Minister's actions amount to administrative action under PAJA.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the Minister for Justice and Constitutional Development has a constitutional obligation to process applications for presidential pardon and to do what is necessary to enable the President to exercise his powers under section 84(2)(j) of the Constitution in an informed manner. The preparatory steps required for the President to make a decision on pardons are executive functions that fall within the ambit of section 85(2)(e) of the Constitution and are the responsibility of the relevant department. The Minister's failure to perform these functions constitutes a breach of section 92(3)(a) and section 237 of the Constitution. The court rejected the...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs, including costs occasioned by the employment of two counsel.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed with costs, including those occasioned by the employment of two counsel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment