Minister of Rural Development and Land Reform v Public Servants Association and Others (J836/12; JR602/12) [2018] ZALCJHB 404 (4 December 2018)

Minister of Rural Development and Land Reform v Public Servants Association and Others (J836/12; JR602/12) [2018] ZALCJHB 404 (4 December 2018)

The court considered the submissions made by the applicant and found that there are reasonable prospects of success on appeal. As the respondents did not file substantive submissions, the court was satisfied that the requirements for granting leave to appeal were met. Accordingly, leave to appeal was granted and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] ZALCJHB 404
Parties
Applicant: Minister of Rural Development and Land Reform; Respondent: Public Servants Association; Respondent: Jongikhaya A George; Respondent: Zumaxolo Mgulwa; Respondent: Lonwabo B Ntshebe; Respondent: Thilivhali Tshinyani
Court
Labour Court Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Case Number
J836/12; JR602/12
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal After Judgment
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted.
Judges
Lallie
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Prospects of Success
Labour Law Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Prospects of Success

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Minister of Rural Development and Land Reform

Applicant

Public Servants Association

Respondent

Jongikhaya A George

Respondent

Zumaxolo Mgulwa

Respondent

Lonwabo B Ntshebe

Respondent

Thilivhali Tshinyani

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal After Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has reasonable prospects of success on appeal.
  2. 2 Whether leave to appeal should be granted.

Ratio Decidendi

The court considered the submissions made by the applicant and found that there are reasonable prospects of success on appeal. As the respondents did not file substantive submissions, the court was satisfied that the requirements for granting leave to appeal were met. Accordingly, leave to appeal was granted and costs were ordered to be costs in the appeal.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted.

Orders

  • The application for leave to appeal is granted.
  • Costs to be costs in the appeal.