Minister of Safety And Security and Another v Govender (JS164/03) [2010] ZALCJHB 81 (16 November 2010)

Minister of Safety And Security and Another v Govender (JS164/03) [2010] ZALCJHB 81 (16 November 2010)

The Labour Court does not have jurisdiction to adjudicate the respondent's unfair discrimination claim insofar as it is based on the employer's failure to adhere to its Employment Equity Plan, as the respondent did not exhaust the dispute resolution mechanisms provided in Chapter V of the Employment Equity Act. The condonation for late referral was valid and unchallenged, but the underlying claim relies on provisions that require prior enforcement steps. The court also lacks jurisdiction over the unfair labour practice claim relating to promotion, which falls within the jurisdiction of the CCMA. The special pleas relating to jurisdiction are upheld, and the respondent's referral is...

Citation
[2010] ZALCJHB 81
Parties
Applicant: Minister of Safety and Security; Applicant: South African Police Services; Respondent: Kasaval Govender
Court
Labour Court Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
16 November 2010
Case Number
JS 164/03
Procedural Posture
Special Plea Application / Interlocutory Application on Jurisdiction and Special Pleas
Outcome
Special pleas relating to jurisdiction are upheld; respondent's referral is dismissed.
Judges
Lagrange
Legal Topics
Employment Equity Act, Unfair Discrimination, Jurisdiction, Condonation, Promotion Disputes
Labour Law Civil Procedure Employment Equity Act Unfair Discrimination Jurisdiction Condonation Promotion Disputes

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Minister of Safety and Security

Applicant

South African Police Services

Applicant

Kasaval Govender

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Special Plea Application / Interlocutory Application on Jurisdiction and Special Pleas

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Labour Court has jurisdiction to adjudicate the respondent's unfair discrimination claim under the Employment Equity Act.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent exhausted the dispute resolution mechanisms under Chapter V of the Employment Equity Act before approaching the Labour Court.
  3. 3 Whether the referral of the dispute to the CCMA was timeous and properly condoned.

Ratio Decidendi

The Labour Court does not have jurisdiction to adjudicate the respondent's unfair discrimination claim insofar as it is based on the employer's failure to adhere to its Employment Equity Plan, as the respondent did not exhaust the dispute resolution mechanisms provided in Chapter V of the Employment Equity Act. The condonation for late referral was valid and unchallenged, but the underlying claim relies on provisions that require prior enforcement steps. The court also lacks jurisdiction over the unfair labour practice claim relating to promotion, which falls within the jurisdiction of the CCMA. The special pleas relating to jurisdiction are upheld, and the respondent's referral is...

Court Disposition

Special pleas relating to jurisdiction are upheld; respondent's referral is dismissed.

Orders

  • All special pleas are dismissed except for the plea that the court lacks jurisdiction over the unfair discrimination claim, which is upheld.
  • The Labour Court has no jurisdiction to hear the respondent's unfair labour practice claim relating to promotion.