Minister of Transport v Du Toit (615/02) [2004] ZASCA 55; [2004] 4 All SA 603 (SCA); 2005 (1) SA 16 (SCA); 2005 (10) BCLR 964 (SCA) (28 May 2004)

Minister of Transport v Du Toit (615/02) [2004] ZASCA 55; [2004] 4 All SA 603 (SCA); 2005 (1) SA 16 (SCA); 2005 (10) BCLR 964 (SCA) (28 May 2004)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the expropriation was effected under s 8(1)(c) of the National Roads Act, authorizing only a temporary right to use the land for gravel extraction. Compensation is governed by s 12(1)(b) of the Expropriation Act, which limits recovery to actual financial loss suffered by the owner. The evidence did not establish that Du Toit suffered any actual financial loss, as the removal of gravel did not diminish his ability to exploit the remaining reserves for decades, and the market for gravel was artificially created by the project itself. The trial court erred in awarding compensation based on the market value of the gravel removed. The Minister's offer of...

Citation
[2004] ZASCA 55
Parties
Appellant: Minister of Transport; Respondent: P J Du Toit
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
28 May 2004
Case Number
615/02
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Trial Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeal upheld; trial court order set aside and replaced with reduced compensation.
Judges
Howie, Harms, Farlam, Cameron, Heher
Legal Topics
Expropriation, Actual Financial Loss, Just and Equitable Compensation, National Roads Act, Expropriation Act, Bill of Rights Limitation
Land and Property Constitutional Law Civil Procedure Expropriation Actual Financial Loss Just and Equitable Compensation National Roads Act Expropriation Act +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Minister of Transport

Appellant

P J Du Toit

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Trial Court Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the expropriation of a temporary right to use land for gravel extraction entitles the owner to compensation for the market value of the gravel removed.
  2. 2 Whether the owner suffered actual financial loss as a result of the expropriation under s 12(1)(b) of the Expropriation Act.
  3. 3 Whether the compensation awarded by the trial court was justified under the Constitution and relevant statutes.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the expropriation was effected under s 8(1)(c) of the National Roads Act, authorizing only a temporary right to use the land for gravel extraction. Compensation is governed by s 12(1)(b) of the Expropriation Act, which limits recovery to actual financial loss suffered by the owner. The evidence did not establish that Du Toit suffered any actual financial loss, as the removal of gravel did not diminish his ability to exploit the remaining reserves for decades, and the market for gravel was artificially created by the project itself. The trial court erred in awarding compensation based on the market value of the gravel removed. The Minister's offer of...

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld; trial court order set aside and replaced with reduced compensation.

Orders

  • The defendant is ordered to pay compensation to the plaintiff in the amount of R6060,00 plus a solatium in terms of s 12(2) of the Act in an amount of R606,00, both sums to carry interest in terms of s 12(3)(a) of the Act from 17 November 1997 to date of payment.
  • The plaintiff is to pay the costs of the action.