MISA / SAMWU obo Members v Madikor Drie (Pty) Ltd (J116/04) [2005] ZALC 92; [2006] 1 BLLR 12 (LC); (2005) 26 ILJ 2374 (LC) (14 October 2005)

MISA / SAMWU obo Members v Madikor Drie (Pty) Ltd (J116/04) [2005] ZALC 92; [2006] 1 BLLR 12 (LC); (2005) 26 ILJ 2374 (LC) (14 October 2005)

The court found that the Manpower Reduction Programme, although termed a policy, had been consistently applied and accepted by employees and trade unions, thereby creating legitimate expectations and enforceable obligations regarding severance pay. The respondent, having acquired the business as a going concern, was bound by section 197 of the Labour Relations Act and the terms of the sale agreement, which transferred all rights and obligations, including the retrenchment policy. The respondent could not unilaterally vary the policy to the detriment of the employees, especially where the policy had been relied upon and formed part of the understanding between the parties. Financial...

Citation
[2005] ZALC 92
Parties
Applicant: MISA / SAMWU obo Members; Respondent: Madikor Drie (Pty) Ltd
Court
Labour Court
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
14 October 2005
Case Number
J116/04
Procedural Posture
Specific Performance Application / Judgment
Outcome
Application granted. The respondent is ordered to pay severance packages to the four individual employees in accordance with the Manpower Reduction Programme, with interest from the date of judgment, and to pay the applicant's costs.
Judges
E Revelas
Legal Topics
Severance Pay, Transfer of Business, Legitimate Expectation, Retrenchment Policy, Breach of Contract

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

MISA / SAMWU obo Members

Applicant

Madikor Drie (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Specific Performance Application / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the respondent was entitled to unilaterally vary the severance pay policy inherited from the previous employer.
  2. 2 Whether the Manpower Reduction Programme formed part of the employment contracts and created enforceable rights for the retrenched employees.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent is obliged to pay severance packages in accordance with the reduction programme despite financial difficulties.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Manpower Reduction Programme, although termed a policy, had been consistently applied and accepted by employees and trade unions, thereby creating legitimate expectations and enforceable obligations regarding severance pay. The respondent, having acquired the business as a going concern, was bound by section 197 of the Labour Relations Act and the terms of the sale agreement, which transferred all rights and obligations, including the retrenchment policy. The respondent could not unilaterally vary the policy to the detriment of the employees, especially where the policy had been relied upon and formed part of the understanding between the parties. Financial...

Court Disposition

Application granted. The respondent is ordered to pay severance packages to the four individual employees in accordance with the Manpower Reduction Programme, with interest from the date of judgment, and to pay the applicant's costs.

Orders

  • The respondent is to pay severance packages to the four individual employees as follows: AS Grenfell-Dexter: R73,916.61; W Lehman: R654,079.53; MM Swart: R98,146.48; L Williams: R342,777.55.
  • Interest on the above amounts shall be payable from date of judgment to date of payment.