Mlaudzi v Metro South Towing CC (J1007/15) [2017] ZALCJHB 37 (8 February 2017)
The court held that while section 143 of the Labour Relations Act provides for the certification and enforcement of arbitration awards without the need for a section 158(1)(c) order, section 158(1)(c) remains applicable where the award has not been certified. In this case, the applicant was uncertain about the certification process due to the award being issued by a Bargaining Council. The court found that the applicant had made a proper case for the award to be made an order of court under section 158(1)(c). Furthermore, the applicant was entitled to outstanding remuneration under section 77(3) of the Basic Conditions of Employment Act, as he had tendered his services but was not...
- Citation
- [2017] ZALCJHB 37
- Parties
- Applicant: Witness Mlaudzi; Respondent: Metro South Towing CC
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 8 February 2017
- Case Number
- J1007/15
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Application for Enforcement of Arbitration Award and Outstanding Remuneration
- Outcome
- Application granted. The arbitration award is made an order of court and the respondent is ordered to pay outstanding remuneration and interest.
- Judges
- S Mabaso
- Legal Topics
- Enforcement of Arbitration Award, Section 158 1 C Application, Section 77 3 Bcea, Reinstatement, Outstanding Remuneration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Witness Mlaudzi
Applicant
Metro South Towing CC
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application for Enforcement of Arbitration Award and Outstanding Remuneration
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an arbitration award issued by a Bargaining Council must be made an order of court under section 158(1)(c) of the Labour Relations Act if it has not been certified.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to outstanding remuneration for the period following the arbitration award under section 77(3) of the Basic Conditions of Employment Act.
- 3 Whether the respondent failed to comply with the terms of the arbitration award and the reinstatement order.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that while section 143 of the Labour Relations Act provides for the certification and enforcement of arbitration awards without the need for a section 158(1)(c) order, section 158(1)(c) remains applicable where the award has not been certified. In this case, the applicant was uncertain about the certification process due to the award being issued by a Bargaining Council. The court found that the applicant had made a proper case for the award to be made an order of court under section 158(1)(c). Furthermore, the applicant was entitled to outstanding remuneration under section 77(3) of the Basic Conditions of Employment Act, as he had tendered his services but was not...
Court Disposition
Application granted. The arbitration award is made an order of court and the respondent is ordered to pay outstanding remuneration and interest.
Orders
- The arbitration award under case number MINT 44485N, dated 17 April 2015 and issued by Commissioner S.I Bhabha under the auspices of the Dispute Resolution Centre for the Motor Industry Bargaining Council, is made an order of this Court in terms of section 158(1)(c) of the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995.
- The respondent is ordered to pay the applicant further remuneration from 01 May 2015 to 31 December 2016 in the total amount of R98,800.00.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment