Download PDF

South Africa Judgment

Labour Court Johannesburg

Mlungu v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration and Others (JR1865/19) [2021] ZALCJHB 296 (22 September 2021)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Court found that the applicant failed to comply with the procedural requirements for an application for leave to appeal, specifically the obligation to file written submissions within ten days of lodging the application. As a result, the application was defective and not properly before the Court. The Court dismissed the application for leave to appeal on this basis.

Court disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • The applicant’s application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
  • There is no order as to costs.

02

Material facts

Parties

Sibonile Mlungu

Applicant

Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration

Respondent

Zanele Sibaya N.O.

Respondent

Impala Platinum Limited

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Dismissal of Review Application

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant sought leave to appeal the dismissal of his review application regarding the refusal of condonation for late referral of an unfair dismissal dispute. No written submissions in support of the leave to appeal were filed as required by the rules.
Respondent
The respondents did not file opposing submissions. The Court considered the procedural defect arising from the applicant's failure to comply with the rules regarding written submissions for leave to appeal.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Rule 30(3A) of the Labour Court Rules; Practice Manual paragraph 15.2

    An application for leave to appeal must comply with the prescribed rules, including the filing of written submissions within the stipulated period.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Court found that the applicant failed to comply with the procedural requirements for an application for leave to appeal, specifically the obligation to file written submissions within ten days of lodging the application. As a result, the application was defective and not properly before the Court. The Court dismissed the application for leave to appeal on this basis.

Obiter and limits

  • The judgment was delivered electronically and published on the Labour Court’s website, reflecting current practice in the Labour Court.

Court disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed.

  • The applicant’s application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
  • There is no order as to costs.

Source and reliance status

Labour Court Johannesburg

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Labour Court Johannesburg

Judgment

[2021] ZALCJHB 296

IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG

Not Reportable

JR 1865/19

In the matter between:

SIBONILE MLUNGU Applicant

and

COMMISSION FOR

CONCILIATION

MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION First

Respondent

ZANELE SIBAYA N.O. Second

Respondent

IMPALA PLATINUM LIMITED Third

Respondent

Decided in Chambers:

Delivered: This judgment was handed down electronically by circulation to the parties' legal representatives by email and publication on the Labour Court’s website. The date and time for hand-down is deemed to be 22 September 2021 at …

JUDGMENT:

LEAVE TO APPEAL

TLHOTLHALEMAJE, J

[1] On 13 April 2021, this Court dismissed the applicant’s application to review and set aside the second respondent’s ruling in terms of which his late referral of an alleged unfair dismissal dispute to the first respondent was not condoned.

[2] The applicant has since filed an application for leave to appeal against the order of the Court. The application for leave to appeal was filed on 28 April 2021. In terms of rule 30(3A) of the Rules of this Court read with paragraph 15.2 of the Practice Manual, the applicant ought to have filed his written submission within 10 days from the filing of the application for leave to appeal. As at the writing of this judgment, the applicant had not filed his written submission in support of the leave to appeal. The purported application for leave to appeal is therefore defective and not properly before the Court. In such circumstances, the application ought to be dismissed.

[3] Accordingly, the following order is made;

Order:

1 The applicant’s application for leave to appeal is dismissed.

2. There is no order as to costs.

Edwin Tlhotlhalemaje

Judge of the Labour Court of South Africa

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Rule 30(3A) of the Labour Court Rules

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Practice Manual paragraph 15.2

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.