Mlungwana and Others v S and Another (A431/15) [2018] ZAWCHC 3; [2018] 2 All SA 183 (WCC); 2018 (1) SACR 538 (WCC) (24 January 2018)
The court found that section 12(1)(a) of the Regulation of Gatherings Act, which criminalises convening a gathering of more than 15 people without prior notice, constitutes a limitation of the right to peaceful assembly under section 17 of the Constitution. The limitation is not reasonable or justifiable in an open and democratic society, as the criminal sanction is disproportionate to the legitimate purpose of regulating gatherings and facilitating police planning. The effect of a criminal conviction is severe and enduring, especially for vulnerable communities, and deters the exercise of constitutional rights. Less restrictive means, such as administrative fines or civil liability,...
- Citation
- [2018] ZAWCHC 3
- Parties
- Appellant: Phumeza Mlungwana; Appellant: Xoliswa Mbadisa; Appellant: Luvo Mankqa; Appellant: Nomhle Maci; Appellant: Zingisa Mrwebi; Appellant: Mlondolozi Sinuku; Appellant: Vuyolwethu Sinuku; Appellant: Ezethu Sebezo; Appellant: Nolulamo Jara; Appellant: Abdurrazack Achmat; Respondent: The State; Respondent: Minister of Police
- Court
- Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 24 January 2018
- Case Number
- A431/15
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Constitutional Challenge
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; convictions set aside; section 12(1)(a) of the Regulation of Gatherings Act declared unconstitutional to the extent that it criminalises convening a gathering of more than 15 people solely for lack of notice.
- Judges
- Ndita, Magona
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Assembly, Regulation of Gatherings Act, Criminalisation of Peaceful Protest, Bill of Rights Limitation, Constitutional Invalidity, Notice Requirement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Phumeza Mlungwana
Appellant
Xoliswa Mbadisa
Appellant
Luvo Mankqa
Appellant
Nomhle Maci
Appellant
Zingisa Mrwebi
Appellant
Mlondolozi Sinuku
Appellant
Vuyolwethu Sinuku
Appellant
Ezethu Sebezo
Appellant
Nolulamo Jara
Appellant
Abdurrazack Achmat
Appellant
The State
Respondent
Minister of Police
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Constitutional Challenge
Legal Issues
- 1 Does section 12(1)(a) of the Regulation of Gatherings Act criminalising convening a gathering without notice unjustifiably limit the right to peaceful assembly under section 17 of the Constitution?
- 2 Is the limitation imposed by section 12(1)(a) reasonable and justifiable in an open and democratic society?
- 3 Are there less restrictive means to achieve the legitimate purpose of regulating gatherings without resorting to criminal sanctions?
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that section 12(1)(a) of the Regulation of Gatherings Act, which criminalises convening a gathering of more than 15 people without prior notice, constitutes a limitation of the right to peaceful assembly under section 17 of the Constitution. The limitation is not reasonable or justifiable in an open and democratic society, as the criminal sanction is disproportionate to the legitimate purpose of regulating gatherings and facilitating police planning. The effect of a criminal conviction is severe and enduring, especially for vulnerable communities, and deters the exercise of constitutional rights. Less restrictive means, such as administrative fines or civil liability,...
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; convictions set aside; section 12(1)(a) of the Regulation of Gatherings Act declared unconstitutional to the extent that it criminalises convening a gathering of more than 15 people solely for lack of notice.
Orders
- The appellants' appeal against conviction is upheld and the convictions are set aside.
- Section 12(1)(a) of the Regulation of Gatherings Act is declared unconstitutional.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment