MM obo GM v Member of the Executive Council for the Department of Health, North West Province (782/2022) [2024] ZASCA 52 (18 April 2024)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the appellant failed to prove her claim for emotional trauma and nervous shock, as there was no evidence of a detectable psychiatric injury. The high court failed to decide the lis regarding emotional shock, and thus the claim must be remitted for determination. The claims for future medical expenses and loss of earnings fell away with the death of GM. The claim for general damages is transmissible to GM's estate, but only the executor has locus standi to prosecute such claims. The appellant, having failed to report GM's death to the Master and lacking locus standi, cannot proceed with the claims on behalf of the deceased child. The proceedings must...
- Citation
- [2024] ZASCA 52
- Parties
- Appellant: M M on behalf of G M; Respondent: Member of the Executive Council for the Department of Health, North West Province
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 18 April 2024
- Case Number
- 782/2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Full Court of North West Division of the High Court, Mahikeng
- Outcome
- Appeal struck off with costs; claim for emotional trauma and nervous shock remitted to trial court; other heads of damages struck off the roll with costs.
- Judges
- Makgoka, Hughes, Matojane, Musi, Chetty
- Legal Topics
- Medical Negligence, Emotional Shock Claims, Locus Standi, Transmissibility of Claims, Causation, Remittal of Claim
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M M on behalf of G M
Appellant
Member of the Executive Council for the Department of Health, North West Province
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Full Court of North West Division of the High Court, Mahikeng
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant has locus standi to prosecute claims on behalf of the deceased minor child.
- 2 Whether the appellant proved her personal claim for emotional trauma and nervous shock.
- 3 Whether claims for damages on behalf of the deceased minor child are transmissible to the estate.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the appellant failed to prove her claim for emotional trauma and nervous shock, as there was no evidence of a detectable psychiatric injury. The high court failed to decide the lis regarding emotional shock, and thus the claim must be remitted for determination. The claims for future medical expenses and loss of earnings fell away with the death of GM. The claim for general damages is transmissible to GM's estate, but only the executor has locus standi to prosecute such claims. The appellant, having failed to report GM's death to the Master and lacking locus standi, cannot proceed with the claims on behalf of the deceased child. The proceedings must...
Court Disposition
Appeal struck off with costs; claim for emotional trauma and nervous shock remitted to trial court; other heads of damages struck off the roll with costs.
Orders
- The order of the full court is set aside and replaced with the following:
- The appellant's claim for emotional trauma and nervous shock is remitted to the trial court for determination.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment