Mmethi v DNM Investment CC t/a Bloemfontein Celtics Football Club (JS 1298/09) [2010] ZALC 143; [2011] 3 BLLR 268 (LC) ; (2011) 32 ILJ 659 (LC) (1 October 2010)
The Labour Court retains jurisdiction over disputes even where an arbitration clause exists in the employment contract. However, where parties have consensually agreed to refer disputes to private arbitration, the court should be slow to exercise its discretion to entertain the matter unless special circumstances exist. In this case, no special circumstances or unlawfulness were present to justify the court proceeding with the matter. The applicant should exhaust the agreed internal remedy of arbitration, and the court will retain supervisory jurisdiction over the process. Accordingly, the respondent's point in limine is upheld and the proceedings are stayed pending arbitration.
- Citation
- [2010] ZALC 143
- Parties
- Applicant: Soul Mmethi; Respondent: DNM Investment CC t/a Bloemfontein Celtics Football Club
- Court
- Labour Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 1 October 2010
- Case Number
- JS 1298/09
- Procedural Posture
- Stay Application / Trial Judgment on Jurisdictional Point in Limine
- Outcome
- Application stayed pending referral to arbitration; no order as to costs.
- Judges
- Molahlehi
- Legal Topics
- Arbitration Clause, Stay of Proceedings, Jurisdiction of Labour Court, Fixed Term Contract, Operational Requirements Dismissal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Soul Mmethi
Applicant
DNM Investment CC t/a Bloemfontein Celtics Football Club
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Trial Judgment on Jurisdictional Point in Limine
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the arbitration clause in the employment contract oust the jurisdiction of the Labour Court to hear the dispute?
- 2 Should the proceedings be stayed pending private arbitration as agreed by the parties?
- 3 Are there special circumstances justifying the court entertaining the matter despite the arbitration agreement?
Ratio Decidendi
The Labour Court retains jurisdiction over disputes even where an arbitration clause exists in the employment contract. However, where parties have consensually agreed to refer disputes to private arbitration, the court should be slow to exercise its discretion to entertain the matter unless special circumstances exist. In this case, no special circumstances or unlawfulness were present to justify the court proceeding with the matter. The applicant should exhaust the agreed internal remedy of arbitration, and the court will retain supervisory jurisdiction over the process. Accordingly, the respondent's point in limine is upheld and the proceedings are stayed pending arbitration.
Court Disposition
Application stayed pending referral to arbitration; no order as to costs.
Orders
- The applicant’s claim is stayed pending referral to arbitration and determination of the dispute by the Dispute Resolution Chamber as contemplated in the National Soccer League’s constitution.
- There is no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment