Mobile Telephone Network(Pty) Ltd v Vodacom (Pty) Limited and Anothers (A5074/2018, 25771/2018) [2019] ZAGPJHC 102 (26 March 2019)
The court held that the requirements of section 18(3) of the Superior Courts Act were satisfied. Vodacom would suffer irreparable harm if the porting order was not implemented pending appeal, as its only potential claim for damages against MTN was delictual for pure economic loss, which was highly uncertain and difficult to prove. MTN, by contrast, had a clear contractual damages claim against Transnet should it ultimately succeed. The court found that the mere existence of a theoretical alternative remedy does not preclude a finding of irreparable harm; the likelihood of success must be assessed on the probabilities. Exceptional circumstances existed due to the time-limited nature of the...
- Citation
- [2019] ZAGPJHC 102
- Parties
- Appellant: Mobile Telephone Networks (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Vodacom (Pty) Limited; Respondent: Transnet SOC Limited
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 26 March 2019
- Case Number
- A5074/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Section 18(1) Order Under Superior Courts Act
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs, including costs of both senior and junior counsel.
- Judges
- R M Keightley, CG Lamont, TP Mudau
- Legal Topics
- Section 18 Superior Courts Act, Interim Execution Pending Appeal, Irreparable Harm, Exceptional Circumstances, Mobile Number Porting, Tender Award Dispute
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mobile Telephone Networks (Pty) Ltd
Appellant
Vodacom (Pty) Limited
Respondent
Transnet SOC Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Section 18(1) Order Under Superior Courts Act
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the requirements for granting relief under section 18(3) of the Superior Courts Act were satisfied.
- 2 Whether Vodacom would suffer irreparable harm if the order was not implemented pending appeal.
- 3 Whether MTN would suffer irreparable harm if the order was implemented.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the requirements of section 18(3) of the Superior Courts Act were satisfied. Vodacom would suffer irreparable harm if the porting order was not implemented pending appeal, as its only potential claim for damages against MTN was delictual for pure economic loss, which was highly uncertain and difficult to prove. MTN, by contrast, had a clear contractual damages claim against Transnet should it ultimately succeed. The court found that the mere existence of a theoretical alternative remedy does not preclude a finding of irreparable harm; the likelihood of success must be assessed on the probabilities. Exceptional circumstances existed due to the time-limited nature of the...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs, including costs of both senior and junior counsel.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed with costs including the costs of both senior and junior counsel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment