Mobile Telephone Networks (Pty) Limited v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service (79960/2019) [2021] ZAGPPHC 1; 83 SATC 270 (12 January 2021)
The court held that the applicant's multi-purpose airtime vouchers are not akin to gift vouchers but are specific to the supply of 'airtime', which constitutes specified goods or services. The supply of such vouchers attracts revenue for the applicant at the point of sale, and VAT must be accounted for in the period in which the voucher is sold, as per section 9(1) and section 7(1)(a) of the VAT Act. The respondent's interpretation, consistently applied over time, is correct: the vouchers fall within section 10(19), not section 10(18). The declaratory relief sought is competent, but the applicant failed to establish that its vouchers should be treated under section 10(18). The application...
- Citation
- [2021] ZAGPPHC 1
- Parties
- Applicant: Mobile Telephone Networks (Pty) Limited; Respondent: Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 12 January 2021
- Case Number
- 79960/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel where so employed.
- Judges
- W Hughes
- Legal Topics
- Value Added Tax, Multi Purpose Vouchers, Statutory Interpretation, Declaratory Relief
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mobile Telephone Networks (Pty) Limited
Applicant
Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the supply of pre-paid multi-purpose vouchers by the applicant should be treated under section 10(18) or section 10(19) of the VAT Act for VAT purposes.
- 2 Whether the declaratory relief sought by the applicant is competent in the context of the VAT Act.
- 3 Whether the respondent's ruling on the VAT treatment of airtime vouchers should be set aside.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the applicant's multi-purpose airtime vouchers are not akin to gift vouchers but are specific to the supply of 'airtime', which constitutes specified goods or services. The supply of such vouchers attracts revenue for the applicant at the point of sale, and VAT must be accounted for in the period in which the voucher is sold, as per section 9(1) and section 7(1)(a) of the VAT Act. The respondent's interpretation, consistently applied over time, is correct: the vouchers fall within section 10(19), not section 10(18). The declaratory relief sought is competent, but the applicant failed to establish that its vouchers should be treated under section 10(18). The application...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel where so employed.
Orders
- The application for a declaratory order as set out in the notice of motion of the applicant is dismissed with costs.
- Such costs are to include the employment of two counsel, where so employed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment