Modisane v Modikwe and Others (8166/2022) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1 (1 January 2023)
- Citation
- [2023] ZAGPJHC 1
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Panel
- Twala ML
- Case number
- 8166/2022
More details
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Panel
- Twala ML
- Case number
- 8166/2022
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court found that the applicant was married to the first respondent in community of property according to customary law, as previously declared by the court. The first respondent, despite being served and not opposing the registration of the customary marriage, subsequently entered into a civil marriage with the fourth respondent. The law prohibits a man in a subsisting customary union from contracting a civil marriage with another woman who is not his customary partner. Such a civil marriage is a nullity. The applicant made out a clear case for the relief sought, and the civil marriage between the first and fourth respondent was declared unlawful and set aside. The authorities were directed to register the applicant's customary marriage.
Court disposition
Application granted. The civil marriage between the first and fourth respondent is declared unlawful and set aside. The authorities are directed to register the applicant's customary marriage.
Orders
- The civil marriage between the first and fourth respondent is declared unlawful and set aside.
- The second and third respondents are directed to register the marriage entered into between the applicant and the first respondent within thirty (30) days of this order.
02
Material facts
Parties
Modisane Kgomotso Grannie
Applicant Counsel: Advocate WB NdlovuModikwe Lesley
First Respondent Counsel: Mphahlele MW AttorneysMinister of Home Affairs
Second Respondent Counsel: State AttorneyDirector General of Home Affairs
Third Respondent Counsel: State AttorneyKomane Patricia
Fourth Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Declaratory Application / Unopposed Motion Court
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the civil marriage between the first and fourth respondent is valid during the subsistence of a customary marriage between the applicant and first respondent.
- 02
Whether the applicant's customary marriage should be registered and a marriage certificate issued.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The applicant argued that she was married in community of property to the first respondent under customary law, as declared by a previous court order. She contended that the subsequent civil marriage between the first and fourth respondent was invalid, as it was contracted during the subsistence of her customary marriage. She sought a declaration of invalidity of the civil marriage and an order compelling the registration of her customary marriage.
- Respondent
- The first, second, and third respondents filed notices to abide by the court's decision and did not oppose the application. The fourth respondent did not file any notice to oppose or participate in the proceedings.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Thembisile v Thembisile 2002 (2) SA 209 (T)
A man who is a partner in a customary union cannot contract a civil marriage with another woman during the subsistence of the customary union. Only a civil marriage with the partner in the customary union is competent; any other civil marriage is a nullity.
- 02
Netshituka v Netshituka and Others (462/10) [2011] ZASCA 120
A civil marriage contracted while a man is a partner in an existing customary union with another woman is a nullity.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court found that the applicant was married to the first respondent in community of property according to customary law, as previously declared by the court. The first respondent, despite being served and not opposing the registration of the customary marriage, subsequently entered into a civil marriage with the fourth respondent. The law prohibits a man in a subsisting customary union from contracting a civil marriage with another woman who is not his customary partner. Such a civil marriage is a nullity. The applicant made out a clear case for the relief sought, and the civil marriage between the first and fourth respondent was declared unlawful and set aside. The authorities were directed to register the applicant's customary marriage.
Obiter and limits
- The case was unopposed, and the respondents either abided by the court's decision or did not participate.
- Service of documents was personal on both the first and fourth respondents, ensuring proper notice.
Court disposition
Application granted. The civil marriage between the first and fourth respondent is declared unlawful and set aside. The authorities are directed to register the applicant's customary marriage.
- The civil marriage between the first and fourth respondent is declared unlawful and set aside.
- The second and third respondents are directed to register the marriage entered into between the applicant and the first respondent within thirty (30) days of this order.
Source and reliance status
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Judgment
IN
THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG
CASE NO: 8166/2022
REPORTABLE:
NO
OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: NO
REVISED.
04/01/23
In the matter between:
MODISANE
KGOMOTSO GRANNIE
APPLICANT And
MODIKWE
LESLEY
FIRST
RESPONDENT
THE
MINISTER OF HOME AFFAIRS
SECOND
RESPONENT
DIRECTOR
GENERAL OF HOME AFFAIRS
THIRD
RESPONDENT
KOMANE
PATRICIA
FOURTH
RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
Delivered: This judgment and order was prepared and authored by the Judge whose name is reflected and is handed down electronically by circulation to Parties / their legal representatives by email and by uploading it to the electronic file of this matter on Case Lines. The date of the order is deemed to be the 4th of January 2023.
TWALA J
[1] This application served before this Court in the unopposed motion Court roll wherein the applicant sought the declaratory relief and other ancillary orders in the following terms:
1.1 that the civil union marriage between the first and fourth respondent is deemed invalid and unlawful, and is therefore set aside,
1.2 that the second and third respondents register the applicant marriage and issue her with a marriage certificate,
1.3 Costs of suits if opposed
1.4 further and or alternative relief.
[2] As indicated above, the case was unopposed. The first, second and third respondents filed their notices to abide with the decision of this Court. However, the fourth respondents did not file any notice to oppose. On engaging with counsel for the applicant it was submitted that service of the documents was personal on both the first and fourth respondents. I therefore reserved judgment in order to reconsider the matter. I directed counsel to file heads of argument so that I could consider the matter properly which heads have since been filed.
[3] It is common cause that the applicant was granted a declaratory order by this Court per Nkosi AJ on the 30th of May 2019 under case number 15636/2018 that she was married in community of property according to customary law to the first respondent in terms of section 1, 2 and 3 of the Recognition of the Customary Marriages Act, 120 of 1998 (“The Act”). The Court ordered further that the marriage be registered by the relevant authorities in terms of the act. It is further undisputed that the first respondent was served with the application to declare and register the customary marriage on the 24th of July 2018 and he did not file any opposition. However, on the 2nd of October 2018 he proceeded to conclude a marriage by civil rights with the fourth respondent.
[4] It has long been established that it is impermissible for a man who is a partner in a customary union to contract a civil marriage with another woman who is not his partner in a customary union during the subsistence of the customary union. Put differently, it is competent for a man who is a partner in a customary union to conclude a civil marriage only with the woman who is his partner in the customary union. Furthermore, it is trite that a civil marriage contracted while the man is a partner in an existing customary union with another woman is a nullity. (See Thembisile v Thembisile 2002 (2) SA 209 (T) which was followed in Netshituka v Netshituka and Others (462/10) [2011] ZASCA 120).
[5] I have reconsidered the case and the ineluctable conclusion is that the applicant has made out an unassailable case and is therefore entitled to the relief that she seeks.
[6] In the circumstances, I make the following order:
1. The civil marriage between the first and fourth respondent is declared unlawful and is set aside,
2. The second and third respondents are directed to register the marriage entered into between the applicant and the first respondent within thirty (30) days of this order.
TWALA
M L
JUDGE
OF THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
GAUTENG
LOCAL DIVISION
Date of Hearing: 8th November 2022
Date of Judgment: 4th January 2023
For the Applicants: Advocate WB Ndlovu
Instructed by: E Baloyi Attorneys
Tel: 082 444 0417
baloyieric@gmail.com
For the First
Respondent: Mphahlele MW Attorneys
Tel: 011 568 2937
info@mwmattorneys.co.za
for the second and
third respondents: State Attorney
Tel: 011 330 7629
cjossie@justice.gov.za
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.