Modisane v Modikwe and Others (8166/2022) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1 (1 January 2023)
The court found that the applicant was married to the first respondent in community of property according to customary law, as previously declared by the court. The first respondent, despite being served and not opposing the registration of the customary marriage, subsequently entered into a civil marriage with the fourth respondent. The law prohibits a man in a subsisting customary union from contracting a civil marriage with another woman who is not his customary partner. Such a civil marriage is a nullity. The applicant made out a clear case for the relief sought, and the civil marriage between the first and fourth respondent was declared unlawful and set aside. The authorities were...
- Citation
- [2023] ZAGPJHC 1
- Parties
- Applicant: Modisane Kgomotso Grannie; First Respondent: Modikwe Lesley; Second Respondent: Minister of Home Affairs; Third Respondent: Director General of Home Affairs; Fourth Respondent: Komane Patricia
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 4 January 2023
- Case Number
- 8166/2022
- Procedural Posture
- Declaratory Application / Unopposed Motion Court
- Outcome
- Application granted. The civil marriage between the first and fourth respondent is declared unlawful and set aside. The authorities are directed to register the applicant's customary marriage.
- Judges
- Twala ML
- Legal Topics
- Customary Marriage Registration, Civil Union Nullity, Recognition of Customary Marriages Act, Declaratory Relief
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Modisane Kgomotso Grannie
Applicant
Modikwe Lesley
First Respondent
Minister of Home Affairs
Second Respondent
Director General of Home Affairs
Third Respondent
Komane Patricia
Fourth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Declaratory Application / Unopposed Motion Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the civil marriage between the first and fourth respondent is valid during the subsistence of a customary marriage between the applicant and first respondent.
- 2 Whether the applicant's customary marriage should be registered and a marriage certificate issued.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant was married to the first respondent in community of property according to customary law, as previously declared by the court. The first respondent, despite being served and not opposing the registration of the customary marriage, subsequently entered into a civil marriage with the fourth respondent. The law prohibits a man in a subsisting customary union from contracting a civil marriage with another woman who is not his customary partner. Such a civil marriage is a nullity. The applicant made out a clear case for the relief sought, and the civil marriage between the first and fourth respondent was declared unlawful and set aside. The authorities were...
Court Disposition
Application granted. The civil marriage between the first and fourth respondent is declared unlawful and set aside. The authorities are directed to register the applicant's customary marriage.
Orders
- The civil marriage between the first and fourth respondent is declared unlawful and set aside.
- The second and third respondents are directed to register the marriage entered into between the applicant and the first respondent within thirty (30) days of this order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment