Download PDF

South Africa Judgment

Consumer Affairs Court

Modise v Eye-Con Manufacturing (NW013/2017) [2017] ZACONAF 3 (7 November 2017)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court found that the parties had reached agreement regarding the amendment of the claim amount to R82,000.00 and the delivery of the Cold Room and VIP Toilets. The order was made by consent, requiring the defendant to deliver the specified goods by the agreed dates. The matter was postponed for confirmation of compliance, and no costs were awarded. The court's decision was unanimous among the members present.

Court disposition

Order granted by agreement; matter postponed for confirmation of compliance.

Orders

  • The claim amount is amended to R82,000.00 paid on 6 June 2016.
  • The defendant is ordered to deliver the specified Cold Room to the plaintiff on or before 10 November 2017.
  • The defendant is ordered to deliver two specified VIP Toilets to the plaintiff by no later than 24 November 2017.
  • The matter is postponed to 5 December 2017 for confirmation of compliance.
  • No costs are awarded.

02

Material facts

Parties

T.G Modise

Plaintiff Counsel: Mr. Letsogo

Eye-Con Manufacturing

Defendant Counsel: Mr. Rabaji

Amounts and remedies

  • Claim Amount: ZAR 82,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil Procedure / Trial

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The plaintiff, represented by Mr. Letsogo, argued that he paid R82,000.00 on 6 June 2016 for the Cold Room and VIP Toilets, and that the defendant is contractually obliged to deliver these items as agreed. The plaintiff sought amendment of the claim amount to reflect the actual payment and requested specific performance for delivery of the goods.
Respondent
The defendant, represented by Mr. Rabaji, did not dispute the payment or the obligation to deliver the specified goods. The parties reached agreement on the amendment of the claim amount and the delivery dates for the Cold Room and VIP Toilets, and consented to the terms of the order.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Modise v Eye-Con Manufacturing (NW013/2017) [2017] ZACONAF 3

    Where parties reach agreement on the terms of delivery and payment, the court may make an order by consent reflecting those terms.

  2. 02

    Modise v Eye-Con Manufacturing (NW013/2017) [2017] ZACONAF 3

    Specific performance is an appropriate remedy where the subject matter of the contract is ascertainable and delivery is feasible.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court found that the parties had reached agreement regarding the amendment of the claim amount to R82,000.00 and the delivery of the Cold Room and VIP Toilets. The order was made by consent, requiring the defendant to deliver the specified goods by the agreed dates. The matter was postponed for confirmation of compliance, and no costs were awarded. The court's decision was unanimous among the members present.

Obiter and limits

  • The court noted the importance of parties reaching settlement and the efficiency of resolving disputes by agreement.
  • No costs were awarded, reflecting the consensual nature of the proceedings.

Court disposition

Order granted by agreement; matter postponed for confirmation of compliance.

  • The claim amount is amended to R82,000.00 paid on 6 June 2016.
  • The defendant is ordered to deliver the specified Cold Room to the plaintiff on or before 10 November 2017.
  • The defendant is ordered to deliver two specified VIP Toilets to the plaintiff by no later than 24 November 2017.
  • The matter is postponed to 5 December 2017 for confirmation of compliance.
  • No costs are awarded.

Source and reliance status

Consumer Affairs Court

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Consumer Affairs Court

Judgment

[2017] ZACONAF 3

IN THE CONSUMER AFFAIRS COURT

FOR THE NORTH WEST PROVINCE

HELD AT MMABATHO

Case number: NW013/2017

In the matter between:-

T.G

MODISE

PLAINTIFF

And

EYE-CON

MANUFACTURING

DEFENDANT

On 07 November 2017

Members: J. Nkomo, P. Hlahane and K. Kgomongwe

JUDGMENT

Introduction

This is a judgment of this court wherein all the members that were present at the hearing were unanimous on the decision reached.

Order

Having heard Mr. Letsogo who acted on behalf of the plaintiff as well as having heard Mr. Rabaji who acted on behalf of the defendant, the following order is made by agreement between the parties:-

1. The claim amount is amended to reflect as R 82 000.00 that was paid on 06 June 2016.

2. The defendant is by agreement between the parties ordered to deliver the specific Cold Room that forms the subject matter of the claim. It is to be delivered on or before 10 November 2017.

3. The defendant is by agreement between the parties ordered to deliver the two (2) specified VIP Toilets to the plaintiff by no later than 24 November 2017.

4. The matter is postponed to 05 December 2017 for confirmation of compliance with this order.

5. No costs.

Dated at Mmabatho on this the 7th day of November 2017.

John Nkomo

Chairperson

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.