Download PDF

South Africa Judgment

South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg

Mofokeng v Mxunya (2021-0081) [2024] ZAGPJHC 260 (12 March 2024)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court determined that the matter was not ready for trial due to incomplete discovery by the defendant. Both parties must fully discover their documents before the trial can proceed. The trial may require several weeks, and the parties should approach the Deputy Judge President for scheduling once discovery is complete. The question of costs is reserved, as further discovery may be necessary from both sides.

Court disposition

The matter is postponed sine die with costs reserved.

Orders

  • The matter is postponed sine die.
  • Costs are reserved.

02

Material facts

Parties

Angelina Tshepiso Mofokeng

Plaintiff Counsel: Adv WF Wannenburg

Simon Plaatjie Mxunya

Defendant

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil Procedure / Pre Trial Postponement

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The plaintiff asserts that the business partnership between the parties must be dissolved and that she is ready to proceed with the trial.
Respondent
The defendant, appearing in person, presented several files of documents that had not been discovered, indicating that the matter is not ready for trial.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Uniform Rules of Court, Rule 35

    A matter should not proceed to trial until both parties have completed discovery of all relevant documents.

  2. 02

    General principles of civil procedure

    The question of costs may be reserved where further discovery is anticipated and the matter is postponed.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court determined that the matter was not ready for trial due to incomplete discovery by the defendant. Both parties must fully discover their documents before the trial can proceed. The trial may require several weeks, and the parties should approach the Deputy Judge President for scheduling once discovery is complete. The question of costs is reserved, as further discovery may be necessary from both sides.

Obiter and limits

  • The trial may need to run for a number of weeks, depending on the extent of the issues and evidence to be presented.
  • Both parties should approach the Deputy Judge President for trial allocation after discovery is complete.

Court disposition

The matter is postponed sine die with costs reserved.

  • The matter is postponed sine die.
  • Costs are reserved.

Source and reliance status

South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg

Judgment

[2024] ZAGPJHC 260

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH

AFRICA

GAUTENG DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG

CASE NUMBER: 2021-0081

1.Reportable: No

2.Of interest to other judges: No

3.Revised

12 March 2024

In the matter between:

ANGELINA TSHEPISO

MOFOKENG

Plaintiff

and

SIMON PLAATJIE

MXUNYA

Defendant

JUDGMENT

WRIGHT J

[1] The parties are agreed that they have a business partnership which must be dissolved. The plaintiff says that she is ready to proceed

[2] The defendant, appearing in person, yesterday produced a number of files of documents not discovered.

[3] The matter is not ready for trial.

[4] The trial, when it proceeds, may need to run for a number of weeks. The parties should approach the Deputy Judge President, once both sides have discovered fully.

[5] I should reserve the question of costs as it may turn out that both sides may need to discover further documents.

ORDER

1. Postponed sine die, costs reserved.

JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT

Heard on:

11 - 12 March 2024

Delivered on: 12 March 2024

Appearances:

For the Plaintiff: Adv WF Wannenburg

083 823 2679

wwannaenburg@mweb.co.za

Instructed by: Esthe Muller Inc Attroneys

esthe@esthemuller.co.za

016 423 2920

For the Defendant: In person

Simon Plaatjie Mxunya

078 116 9826

mndade@yahoo.co.za

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Uniform Rules of Court, Rule 35

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.