Mofokeng v Road Accident Fund (Leave to Appeal) (78908/2018) [2024] ZAGPPHC 730 (30 July 2024)
The court held that the refusal to grant default judgment on the loss of earning capacity claim is interlocutory and not appealable, as it does not have final effect nor does it dispose of the rights of the parties. Even if the decision were appealable, the applicant failed to meet the test under section 17(1) of the Superior Courts Act, as there was insufficient admissible evidence to demonstrate a real and substantial possibility of future loss of earning capacity. The expert opinions relied upon were speculative and unsupported by objective facts, particularly as the applicant was employed for three years post-accident and resigned for reasons not adequately linked to her injuries. The...
- Citation
- [2024] ZAGPPHC 730
- Parties
- Applicant: Laura Nthabiseng Mofokeng; Respondent: Road Accident Fund
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 30 July 2024
- Case Number
- 78908/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Refusal of Default Judgment on Loss of Earning Capacity Claim
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal refused with no order as to costs.
- Judges
- Moshoana
- Legal Topics
- Default Judgment, Loss of Earning Capacity, Appealability, Burden of Proof
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Laura Nthabiseng Mofokeng
Applicant
Road Accident Fund
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Refusal of Default Judgment on Loss of Earning Capacity Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Is the refusal to grant default judgment on the loss of earning capacity claim appealable?
- 2 Has the applicant satisfied the test for leave to appeal under section 17(1) of the Superior Courts Act?
- 3 Did the applicant discharge the burden of proof for the loss of earning capacity claim?
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the refusal to grant default judgment on the loss of earning capacity claim is interlocutory and not appealable, as it does not have final effect nor does it dispose of the rights of the parties. Even if the decision were appealable, the applicant failed to meet the test under section 17(1) of the Superior Courts Act, as there was insufficient admissible evidence to demonstrate a real and substantial possibility of future loss of earning capacity. The expert opinions relied upon were speculative and unsupported by objective facts, particularly as the applicant was employed for three years post-accident and resigned for reasons not adequately linked to her injuries. The...
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal refused with no order as to costs.
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal is refused with no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment