Mohanoe and Others v Master of the High Court, Johannesburg and Others (017606-2023) [2024] ZAGPJHC 155 (19 February 2024)
Neither the typed nor handwritten Will complied with the formal requirements of the Wills Act, as neither was signed by two witnesses. The applicants failed to provide sufficient evidence to establish which Will was executed last or to justify condonation of non-compliance. The Master’s decision to reject both Wills was found to be correct. The first applicant, as executrix, was conflicted due to her active role in litigation and her law firm’s involvement, making it undesirable for her to continue as executrix. The procedural points in limine were not sustained due to lack of prejudice and the need to resolve the matter expeditiously. The application and counter application were...
- Citation
- [2024] ZAGPJHC 155
- Parties
- Applicant: Mahlape Mohanoe N.O.; Applicant: Sibongile Ntando Skele; Applicant: Nkosinathi Siphiwe Mashinini; Applicant: Zanele Busisiwe Mashinini; Applicant: Rachel Sibongile Gama; Respondent: The Master of the High Court, Johannesburg; Respondent: Busisiwe Sharon Mashinini; Respondent: Nelisiwe Ora Hlatswayo; Respondent: Siphiwe Madlala
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 19 February 2024
- Case Number
- 017606/2023
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application and counter application dismissed. First applicant removed as executrix. Master directed to appoint another executor/executrix. Each party to pay their own legal costs; estate not liable for any party’s costs.
- Judges
- Noko
- Legal Topics
- Wills Act Section 2 3, Removal of Executor, Condonation of Late Filing, Lis Pendens, Estate Administration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mahlape Mohanoe N.O.
Applicant
Sibongile Ntando Skele
Applicant
Nkosinathi Siphiwe Mashinini
Applicant
Zanele Busisiwe Mashinini
Applicant
Rachel Sibongile Gama
Applicant
The Master of the High Court, Johannesburg
Respondent
Busisiwe Sharon Mashinini
Respondent
Nelisiwe Ora Hlatswayo
Respondent
Siphiwe Madlala
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Master of the High Court should be directed to accept either the typed or handwritten Will as the last Will and Testament of the deceased.
- 2 Whether the first applicant should be removed as executrix and replaced.
- 3 Whether the second respondent's obstructive conduct warrants an interdict.
Ratio Decidendi
Neither the typed nor handwritten Will complied with the formal requirements of the Wills Act, as neither was signed by two witnesses. The applicants failed to provide sufficient evidence to establish which Will was executed last or to justify condonation of non-compliance. The Master’s decision to reject both Wills was found to be correct. The first applicant, as executrix, was conflicted due to her active role in litigation and her law firm’s involvement, making it undesirable for her to continue as executrix. The procedural points in limine were not sustained due to lack of prejudice and the need to resolve the matter expeditiously. The application and counter application were...
Court Disposition
Application and counter application dismissed. First applicant removed as executrix. Master directed to appoint another executor/executrix. Each party to pay their own legal costs; estate not liable for any party’s costs.
Orders
- The application and the counter application, subject to order 2 below, are dismissed.
- The first applicant is removed as executrix and the Master of the High Court, Johannesburg is directed to appoint another executor/executrix.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment