Mohlala v Mashamaite and Others (2022/059691) [2024] ZAGPJHC 607 (4 July 2024)
The court found that the affidavits and annexure relied upon by the applicant constitute a valid deed of alienation for the purposes of section 2(1) of the Alienation of Land Act. The respondent's denials were rejected as vague and unsupported. The absence of certain terms prescribed by section 6 of the Act did not render the deed void, as those terms were not material to the agreement and the purchaser did not seek to avoid the contract. However, due to the involvement of the state in the allocation and development of the property, and the restrictions imposed by section 10A of the Housing Act, the court determined that the provincial government should be given an opportunity to raise...
- Citation
- [2024] ZAGPJHC 607
- Parties
- Applicant: Thobedi Collins Mohlala; Respondent: Lawrence Mashamaite; Respondent: Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality; Respondent: Registrar of Deeds, Johannesburg
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 4 July 2024
- Case Number
- 2022/059691
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Rule Nisi Issued; Joinder of Fourth Respondent; Interim Relief Pending Return Date
- Outcome
- Rule nisi issued; joinder of the MEC for Human Settlements as fourth respondent; interim declaration of validity of deed of alienation and ownership subject to respondents showing cause; costs reserved.
- Judges
- S D J Wilson
- Legal Topics
- Alienation of Land Act, Deed of Alienation, Instalment Sale Agreement, Housing Subsidy, Joinder of Parties, Rule Nisi
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Thobedi Collins Mohlala
Applicant
Lawrence Mashamaite
Respondent
Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality
Respondent
Registrar of Deeds, Johannesburg
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Rule Nisi Issued; Joinder of Fourth Respondent; Interim Relief Pending Return Date
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sale agreement between Mr. Mohlala and Mr. Mashamaite constitutes a valid deed of alienation under section 2(1) of the Alienation of Land Act 68 of 1981.
- 2 Whether non-compliance with section 6 of the Alienation of Land Act renders the deed of alienation void.
- 3 Whether Mr. Mashamaite had the right to alienate the property under the national housing subsidy scheme at the time of sale.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the affidavits and annexure relied upon by the applicant constitute a valid deed of alienation for the purposes of section 2(1) of the Alienation of Land Act. The respondent's denials were rejected as vague and unsupported. The absence of certain terms prescribed by section 6 of the Act did not render the deed void, as those terms were not material to the agreement and the purchaser did not seek to avoid the contract. However, due to the involvement of the state in the allocation and development of the property, and the restrictions imposed by section 10A of the Housing Act, the court determined that the provincial government should be given an opportunity to raise...
Court Disposition
Rule nisi issued; joinder of the MEC for Human Settlements as fourth respondent; interim declaration of validity of deed of alienation and ownership subject to respondents showing cause; costs reserved.
Orders
- The MEC for Human Settlements (Gauteng) is joined as the fourth respondent.
- A rule nisi is issued calling on the second, third and fourth respondents to show cause on 8 August 2024 why the following order should not be granted: (1) Declaration that annexures TCM 1, TCM 2 and TCM 3 constitute a valid deed of alienation under section 2(1) of the Alienation of Land Act 68 of 1981; (2)...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment