Mojela v Vodacom (NCT/27635/2015/75(1)(b)CPA) [2016] ZANCT 48 (14 March 2016)
The Tribunal found that the Consumer Protection Act does not apply to agreements concluded before its effective date of 31 March 2011. Since the applicant's contract with Vodacom was entered into in October 2002, the Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate the matter under the Act. Furthermore, the requirements for granting leave to refer—reasonable prospects of success and substantial importance—were not met, as the applicant's claim falls outside the scope of the Act. The application for leave to refer is therefore refused.
- Citation
- [2016] ZANCT 48
- Parties
- Applicant: Johannes Andries Mojela; Respondent: Vodacom (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 14 March 2016
- Case Number
- NCT/27635/2015/75(1)(b)CPA
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Refer Directly to Tribunal After NCC Non Referral
- Outcome
- Application for leave to refer is refused due to lack of jurisdiction under the Consumer Protection Act.
- Judges
- F Sibanda, FK Manamela, X May
- Legal Topics
- Consumer Protection Act, Leave to Refer, Jurisdiction of Tribunal, Retrospective Application, Contractual Dispute
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Johannes Andries Mojela
Applicant
Vodacom (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Refer Directly to Tribunal After NCC Non Referral
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal should grant leave to refer the matter directly despite the NCC's notice of non-referral.
- 2 Whether the Consumer Protection Act applies to agreements concluded before its effective date.
- 3 Whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear the matter.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the Consumer Protection Act does not apply to agreements concluded before its effective date of 31 March 2011. Since the applicant's contract with Vodacom was entered into in October 2002, the Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate the matter under the Act. Furthermore, the requirements for granting leave to refer—reasonable prospects of success and substantial importance—were not met, as the applicant's claim falls outside the scope of the Act. The application for leave to refer is therefore refused.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to refer is refused due to lack of jurisdiction under the Consumer Protection Act.
Orders
- The application for leave to refer is refused.
- There is no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment