Mokae and Others v Department of Economic, Small Business Development, Tourism and Environmental Affairs (P236/15) [2015] ZALCPE 49 (2 December 2015)
The Labour Court does not have jurisdiction to review or set aside the applicants' dismissal under section 17(3) of the Public Service Act because the applicants failed to refer their unfair dismissal dispute to conciliation at the Bargaining Council as required by section 191 of the Labour Relations Act. The pending application for leave to appeal under case number P272/2013 is irrelevant to the employment relationship between the applicants and the respondent, as the respondent was not a party to the agreement or arbitration award in those proceedings. The relief sought by the applicants, including reinstatement and an interdict, cannot be granted in the absence of compliance with the...
- Citation
- [2015] ZALCPE 49
- Parties
- Applicant: Masisi Moses Mokae; Applicant: Christine van Heerden; Applicant: Keloapere Dorcas Putsoa; Respondent: Department of Economic, Small Business Development, Tourism and Environmental Affairs
- Court
- Labour Court Port Elizabeth
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 2 December 2015
- Case Number
- P236/15
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed.
- Judges
- Lallie
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Jurisdiction of Labour Court, Public Service Act Termination, Conciliation Requirement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Masisi Moses Mokae
Applicant
Christine van Heerden
Applicant
Keloapere Dorcas Putsoa
Applicant
Department of Economic, Small Business Development, Tourism and Environmental Affairs
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Labour Court has jurisdiction to review and set aside the applicants' dismissal under section 17(3) of the Public Service Act without prior referral to conciliation.
- 2 Whether the pending application for leave to appeal under case number P272/2013 is relevant to the applicants' employment status with the respondent.
- 3 Whether the applicants are entitled to an interdict preventing the respondent from acting against them pending finalisation of the appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The Labour Court does not have jurisdiction to review or set aside the applicants' dismissal under section 17(3) of the Public Service Act because the applicants failed to refer their unfair dismissal dispute to conciliation at the Bargaining Council as required by section 191 of the Labour Relations Act. The pending application for leave to appeal under case number P272/2013 is irrelevant to the employment relationship between the applicants and the respondent, as the respondent was not a party to the agreement or arbitration award in those proceedings. The relief sought by the applicants, including reinstatement and an interdict, cannot be granted in the absence of compliance with the...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed.
Orders
- The application is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment