Mokhethi and Another v Member of the Executive Council for Health of the Gauteng Provincial Government (27522/2011) [2013] ZAGPJHC 227; 2014 (1) SA 93 (GSJ) (3 September 2013)
The defendant admitted liability for medical negligence resulting in severe injury to the minor child, T. The only issue for determination was the quantum of damages. The defendant's application for postponement was refused due to lack of good cause, unexplained delays, and failure to comply with procedural rules regarding expert evidence. The plaintiffs' expert evidence was unchallenged and established the necessity of urgent amputation and prosthesis to prevent further deterioration and emotional harm. Damages were calculated based on actuarial reports, with appropriate contingencies applied. The establishment of a trust for the minor was ordered to ensure proper administration of the...
- Citation
- [2013] ZAGPJHC 227
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Mokhethi, Teboho Johnny; Plaintiff: Mokhethi, Motshadi Evodia; Defendant: Member of the Executive Council for Health of the Gauteng Provincial Government
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 3 September 2013
- Case Number
- 27522/2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Trial / Quantum of Damages After Admission of Liability
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs' claim for damages is upheld; defendant's application for postponement is refused with costs; damages awarded as claimed; trust established for minor; costs awarded on attorney and client scale.
- Judges
- C J Claassen
- Legal Topics
- Medical Negligence, Quantum of Damages, Expert Evidence, Postponement, Trust for Minor, Costs Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mokhethi, Teboho Johnny
Plaintiff
Mokhethi, Motshadi Evodia
Plaintiff
Member of the Executive Council for Health of the Gauteng Provincial Government
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Quantum of Damages After Admission of Liability
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate quantum of damages for the minor child following admitted medical negligence resulting in permanent disability?
- 2 Should the defendant's application for postponement of the trial be granted?
- 3 Is the establishment of a trust for the minor child necessary for the administration of the awarded damages?
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant admitted liability for medical negligence resulting in severe injury to the minor child, T. The only issue for determination was the quantum of damages. The defendant's application for postponement was refused due to lack of good cause, unexplained delays, and failure to comply with procedural rules regarding expert evidence. The plaintiffs' expert evidence was unchallenged and established the necessity of urgent amputation and prosthesis to prevent further deterioration and emotional harm. Damages were calculated based on actuarial reports, with appropriate contingencies applied. The establishment of a trust for the minor was ordered to ensure proper administration of the...
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs' claim for damages is upheld; defendant's application for postponement is refused with costs; damages awarded as claimed; trust established for minor; costs awarded on attorney and client scale.
Orders
- Defendant shall pay plaintiffs, in their representative capacities as parents and natural guardians of their minor son, T T M, a capital amount of R21,480,394.00 in delictual damages, on or before 17 September 2013.
- The amount is payable to the plaintiffs’ attorneys’ trust account as specified.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment