Download PDF

South Africa Ruling

Labour Court Johannesburg

Mokitimi v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration and Another (J2934/12) [2017] ZALCJHB 105 (27 March 2017)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court considered the grounds of appeal raised by the applicant and applied the test for granting leave to appeal, namely whether another court might reasonably come to a different conclusion. The court was satisfied that, having regard to the grounds raised, another court may indeed reach a different outcome. Accordingly, leave to appeal was granted against the whole judgment and order delivered on 12 July 2016.

Court disposition

Leave to appeal granted against the whole judgment and order handed down on 12 July 2016.

Orders

  • The application for leave to appeal is granted against the whole judgment and order handed down by this Court ex tempore on 12 July 2016.

02

Material facts

Parties

Tiisetso William Mokitimi

Applicant

Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration

Respondent

Sedibeng District Municipality

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Extempore Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant submitted several grounds for leave to appeal, contending that the judgment delivered on 12 July 2016 was incorrect and that another court could reasonably reach a different conclusion.
Respondent
The second respondent indicated it would abide by the court's decision and did not oppose the application for leave to appeal.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Section 17(1) of the Superior Courts Act, 10 of 2013

    Leave to appeal should be granted if there is a reasonable possibility that another court may come to a different conclusion.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court considered the grounds of appeal raised by the applicant and applied the test for granting leave to appeal, namely whether another court might reasonably come to a different conclusion. The court was satisfied that, having regard to the grounds raised, another court may indeed reach a different outcome. Accordingly, leave to appeal was granted against the whole judgment and order delivered on 12 July 2016.

Court disposition

Leave to appeal granted against the whole judgment and order handed down on 12 July 2016.

  • The application for leave to appeal is granted against the whole judgment and order handed down by this Court ex tempore on 12 July 2016.

Source and reliance status

Labour Court Johannesburg

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Labour Court Johannesburg

Ruling

[2017] ZALCJHB 105

IN LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG

Not reportable

Case No J2934/12

In the matter between:

TIISETSO WILLIAM MOKITIMI Applicant and COMMISSION FOR CONCILIATION,

MEDIATION AND

ARBITRATION First Respondent

SEDIBENG DISTRICT

MUNICIPALITY Second Respondent

Considered in chambers

Dated: 27 March 2017

JUDGMENT:

LEAVE TO APPEAL

MOTHIBI, AJ

[1] This is an application for leave to appeal an extemporary judgment delivered by this court on 12 July 2016.

[2] The Applicant has filed an application for leave to appeal against that judgment. The Second Respondent has indicated that it will abide by the Court’s decision.

[3] The Applicant has raised a number of grounds in pursuing his application for leave to appeal. It is not necessary for me to regurgitate those grounds in this ruling save to state that I have considered them and am satisfied that based on the test applied to applications of this nature being whether another Court might reasonably come to a different conclusion than the one that I reached in giving my judgment. I accept that another Court, having regard to the grounds of appeal raised by the Applicant

may come to a different conclusion than the one I reached.

[4] In the circumstances, I make the following order:

1. The application for leave to appeal is granted against the whole judgment and order handed down by this Court ex tempore on 12 July 2016.

_______

J Mothibi

Acting Judge of the Labour Court of South Africa

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Superior Courts Act, 10 of 2013

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.