Mokitimi v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration and Another (J2934/12) [2017] ZALCJHB 105 (27 March 2017)
- Citation
- [2017] ZALCJHB 105
- Status
- Ruling
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Panel
- Mothibi
- Case number
- J2934/12
More details
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Panel
- Mothibi
- Case number
- J2934/12
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court considered the grounds of appeal raised by the applicant and applied the test for granting leave to appeal, namely whether another court might reasonably come to a different conclusion. The court was satisfied that, having regard to the grounds raised, another court may indeed reach a different outcome. Accordingly, leave to appeal was granted against the whole judgment and order delivered on 12 July 2016.
Court disposition
Leave to appeal granted against the whole judgment and order handed down on 12 July 2016.
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal is granted against the whole judgment and order handed down by this Court ex tempore on 12 July 2016.
02
Material facts
Parties
Tiisetso William Mokitimi
ApplicantCommission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration
RespondentSedibeng District Municipality
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Extempore Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether leave to appeal should be granted against the extempore judgment delivered on 12 July 2016.
- 02
Whether another court might reasonably come to a different conclusion based on the grounds of appeal raised.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The applicant submitted several grounds for leave to appeal, contending that the judgment delivered on 12 July 2016 was incorrect and that another court could reasonably reach a different conclusion.
- Respondent
- The second respondent indicated it would abide by the court's decision and did not oppose the application for leave to appeal.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Section 17(1) of the Superior Courts Act, 10 of 2013
Leave to appeal should be granted if there is a reasonable possibility that another court may come to a different conclusion.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court considered the grounds of appeal raised by the applicant and applied the test for granting leave to appeal, namely whether another court might reasonably come to a different conclusion. The court was satisfied that, having regard to the grounds raised, another court may indeed reach a different outcome. Accordingly, leave to appeal was granted against the whole judgment and order delivered on 12 July 2016.
Court disposition
Leave to appeal granted against the whole judgment and order handed down on 12 July 2016.
- The application for leave to appeal is granted against the whole judgment and order handed down by this Court ex tempore on 12 July 2016.
Source and reliance status
Labour Court Johannesburg
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Labour Court Johannesburg
Ruling
IN LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG
Not reportable
Case No J2934/12
In the matter between:
TIISETSO WILLIAM MOKITIMI Applicant and COMMISSION FOR CONCILIATION,
MEDIATION AND
ARBITRATION First Respondent
SEDIBENG DISTRICT
MUNICIPALITY Second Respondent
Considered in chambers
Dated: 27 March 2017
JUDGMENT:
LEAVE TO APPEAL
MOTHIBI, AJ
[1] This is an application for leave to appeal an extemporary judgment delivered by this court on 12 July 2016.
[2] The Applicant has filed an application for leave to appeal against that judgment. The Second Respondent has indicated that it will abide by the Court’s decision.
[3] The Applicant has raised a number of grounds in pursuing his application for leave to appeal. It is not necessary for me to regurgitate those grounds in this ruling save to state that I have considered them and am satisfied that based on the test applied to applications of this nature being whether another Court might reasonably come to a different conclusion than the one that I reached in giving my judgment. I accept that another Court, having regard to the grounds of appeal raised by the Applicant
may come to a different conclusion than the one I reached.
[4] In the circumstances, I make the following order:
1. The application for leave to appeal is granted against the whole judgment and order handed down by this Court ex tempore on 12 July 2016.
_______
J Mothibi
Acting Judge of the Labour Court of South Africa
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.