Mokone v Tassos Properties CC and Another (12229/2012) [2016] ZAGPJHC 301 (24 February 2016)

Mokone v Tassos Properties CC and Another (12229/2012) [2016] ZAGPJHC 301 (24 February 2016)

The court found that there are no reasonable prospects that another court would come to a different conclusion than the one reached in the judgment delivered on 24 November 2015. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal was refused.

Citation
[2016] ZAGPJHC 301
Parties
Applicant: Ntswaki Joyce Mokone; Respondent: Tassos Properties CC; Respondent: Blue Canyon Properties 125 CC
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
24 February 2016
Case Number
12229/2012
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal After Judgment
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal refused; applicant ordered to pay costs.
Judges
De Vos
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Costs Order
Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Costs Order

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ntswaki Joyce Mokone

Applicant

Tassos Properties CC

Respondent

Blue Canyon Properties 125 CC

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal After Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted against the judgment delivered on 24 November 2015.
  2. 2 Whether there are reasonable prospects that another court would come to a different conclusion.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that there are no reasonable prospects that another court would come to a different conclusion than the one reached in the judgment delivered on 24 November 2015. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal was refused.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal refused; applicant ordered to pay costs.

Orders

  • The application for leave to appeal is refused.
  • The applicant is ordered to pay the costs of this application.