Molaba and Others v Emfuleni Local Municipality (J1438/07, J1443/07, J1439/07) [2009] ZALC 44; [2009] 7 BLLR 679 (LC); (2009) 30 ILJ 2760 (LC) (17 March 2009)
The court held that the correspondence addressed to the applicants by the respondent's acting human resources manager did not constitute a settlement agreement as contemplated by section 158(1)(c) of the Labour Relations Act. The applicants had not declared a dispute or referred it to the bargaining council prior to the alleged agreement, and the letters merely reflected a mutually agreed variation of their employment contracts. Even if the correspondence could be considered a settlement agreement, the court exercised its discretion to refuse to make it an order, given unresolved defences and the existence of pending unfair labour practice proceedings. Section 158(1)(c) is not intended to...
- Citation
- [2009] ZALC 44
- Parties
- Applicant: Tumelo Stephen Molaba; Applicant: Mmapheelo Roseline Mokoena; Applicant: Mohapinyane Ben Makume; Respondent: Emfuleni Local Municipality
- Court
- Labour Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 17 March 2009
- Case Number
- J1438/07, J1443/07, J1439/07
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Application to Have Alleged Settlement Agreement Made an Order of Court Under Section 158(1)(c) of the Labour Relations Act.
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- Van Niekerk
- Legal Topics
- Settlement Agreement, Section 158 1 C, Authority of Agent, Unfair Labour Practice, Contractual Claims
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tumelo Stephen Molaba
Applicant
Mmapheelo Roseline Mokoena
Applicant
Mohapinyane Ben Makume
Applicant
Emfuleni Local Municipality
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application to Have Alleged Settlement Agreement Made an Order of Court Under Section 158(1)(c) of the Labour Relations Act.
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the correspondence from the respondent's human resources manager constituted a settlement agreement under section 158(1)(c) of the Labour Relations Act.
- 2 Whether the respondent is bound by the terms of the letters addressed to the applicants.
- 3 Whether the court should exercise its discretion to make the alleged agreement an order of court.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the correspondence addressed to the applicants by the respondent's acting human resources manager did not constitute a settlement agreement as contemplated by section 158(1)(c) of the Labour Relations Act. The applicants had not declared a dispute or referred it to the bargaining council prior to the alleged agreement, and the letters merely reflected a mutually agreed variation of their employment contracts. Even if the correspondence could be considered a settlement agreement, the court exercised its discretion to refuse to make it an order, given unresolved defences and the existence of pending unfair labour practice proceedings. Section 158(1)(c) is not intended to...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The applications are dismissed, with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment