Molata v Lakaje and Others (25181/2014) [2016] ZAGPJHC 116 (26 May 2016)
The court found that the title deed for the property was erroneously issued to the First Respondent and her late husband, who were not permit holders. The Director-General's powers do not extend to cancelling a title deed; only a court may do so. The applicant, as the son of the original permit holder, has a legitimate claim to have the title deed cancelled and an inquiry held to determine the rightful claimant. The First Respondent did not assert any entitlement to ownership and failed to provide evidence to challenge the applicant's claim. The only factual dispute—residence at the property—was immaterial to the determination of ownership rights under the relevant legislation. The court...
- Citation
- [2016] ZAGPJHC 116
- Parties
- Applicant: Rapelo Alfred Molata; Respondent: Seanet Lakaje; Respondent: The Executor in the Estate of the late Laban Lakaje; Respondent: The Director-General of the Department of Housing, Gauteng Province; Respondent: The MEC for the Department of Housing, Gauteng Province; Respondent: The City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality; Respondent: The Registrar of Deeds, Johannesburg
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 26 May 2016
- Case Number
- 25181/2014
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment Delivered After Opposed Motion Proceedings
- Outcome
- Application granted. Title deed cancelled. Inquiry ordered. Costs awarded against First Respondent. Possible perjury referred for investigation.
- Judges
- T.V. Ratshibvumo
- Legal Topics
- Title Deed Cancellation, Conversion of Rights Act, Permit Holder Entitlement, Administrative Inquiry, Perjury in Affidavit
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rapelo Alfred Molata
Applicant
Seanet Lakaje
Respondent
The Executor in the Estate of the late Laban Lakaje
Respondent
The Director-General of the Department of Housing, Gauteng Province
Respondent
The MEC for the Department of Housing, Gauteng Province
Respondent
The City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality
Respondent
The Registrar of Deeds, Johannesburg
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment Delivered After Opposed Motion Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the title deed for the property was erroneously issued to the First Respondent and her late husband.
- 2 Whether the Registrar of Deeds should be ordered to cancel the title deed and all rights accorded to the First Respondent.
- 3 Whether an inquiry should be held to determine the rightful claimant to the property under the Conversion of Certain Rights into Leasehold or Ownership Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the title deed for the property was erroneously issued to the First Respondent and her late husband, who were not permit holders. The Director-General's powers do not extend to cancelling a title deed; only a court may do so. The applicant, as the son of the original permit holder, has a legitimate claim to have the title deed cancelled and an inquiry held to determine the rightful claimant. The First Respondent did not assert any entitlement to ownership and failed to provide evidence to challenge the applicant's claim. The only factual dispute—residence at the property—was immaterial to the determination of ownership rights under the relevant legislation. The court...
Court Disposition
Application granted. Title deed cancelled. Inquiry ordered. Costs awarded against First Respondent. Possible perjury referred for investigation.
Orders
- The Registrar of Deeds (Johannesburg) is ordered to cancel Title Deed No. [T4………], which holds property known as ERF [9…..] [M…….] Township, Soweto, and cancel all rights accorded to the First Respondent by virtue of the Title Deed.
- The Director-General for the Department of Housing, Gauteng Province, is directed to hold an inquiry in respect of Erf [9……], [M…….] Township, Soweto, in terms of section 2 of the Conversion of Certain Rights into Leasehold or Ownership Act 81 of 1988, to determine the rightful claimant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment