Molefe v Kenneth Kaunda Municipality and Another (J3408/17; JR2702/14) [2018] ZALCJHB 236 (26 June 2018)
The court found that, for present purposes, a Labour Appeal Court case number had been allocated to the respondents' petition for leave to appeal, and that the petition remained pending. Therefore, the respondents could not be held in contempt for failing to comply with the arbitration award. Additionally, the court noted that the arbitration award had not been made an order of court nor certified in terms of section 143 of the Labour Relations Act, rendering it unenforceable as a court order. As a result, the application for contempt was dismissed.
- Citation
- [2018] ZALCJHB 236
- Parties
- Applicant: Mankwele Molefe; Respondent: Kenneth Kaunda Municipality; Respondent: Ms LS Lesupi
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 26 June 2018
- Case Number
- J3408/17; JR2702/14
- Procedural Posture
- Contempt Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed.
- Judges
- Van Niekerk
- Legal Topics
- Contempt of Court, Arbitration Award Enforcement, Review Application, S158 1 C Application
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mankwele Molefe
Applicant
Kenneth Kaunda Municipality
Respondent
Ms LS Lesupi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Contempt Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondents are in contempt of court for failing to comply with an arbitration award.
- 2 Whether a valid petition for leave to appeal was filed, suspending enforcement.
- 3 Whether the arbitration award is enforceable as an order of court.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, for present purposes, a Labour Appeal Court case number had been allocated to the respondents' petition for leave to appeal, and that the petition remained pending. Therefore, the respondents could not be held in contempt for failing to comply with the arbitration award. Additionally, the court noted that the arbitration award had not been made an order of court nor certified in terms of section 143 of the Labour Relations Act, rendering it unenforceable as a court order. As a result, the application for contempt was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed.
Orders
- The application is dismissed.
- Each party is to bear its own costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment