Molehe v Public Health and Social Development Sectoral Bargaining Council and Others (167/2014) [2019] ZALCCT 19; 167/2014 (2 August 2019)
The court found that the applicant's dismissal was substantively fair, as his absence from work was due to his own criminal conduct resulting in imprisonment. The applicant admitted to being convicted of bribery and corruption, which directly related to his employment duties. The employer's failure to hold a disciplinary hearing rendered the dismissal procedurally unfair, but this was already addressed by the arbitrator's award of compensation. The court emphasized that rigid application of distinctions between criminal and disciplinary proceedings should be avoided, and the facts of each case must be considered. Given the applicant's conviction and the nature of his work, reinstatement...
- Citation
- [2019] ZALCCT 19
- Parties
- Applicant: Lucas Moeketsi Molehe; Respondent: Public Health and Social Development Sectoral Bargaining Council; Respondent: Abraham Nthako N.O.; Respondent: Head: Department of Social Development Free State Province
- Court
- Labour Court Cape Town
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 2 August 2019
- Case Number
- 167/2014
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment on Opposed Review of Arbitration Award
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- Rabkin-Naicker
- Legal Topics
- Dismissal for Incapacity, Procedural Fairness, Substantive Fairness, Criminal Vs Disciplinary Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lucas Moeketsi Molehe
Applicant
Public Health and Social Development Sectoral Bargaining Council
Respondent
Abraham Nthako N.O.
Respondent
Head: Department of Social Development Free State Province
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment on Opposed Review of Arbitration Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant's dismissal for incapacity due to imprisonment was substantively fair.
- 2 Whether the employer's failure to hold a disciplinary hearing rendered the dismissal procedurally unfair.
- 3 Whether the arbitration award should be reviewed and substituted.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant's dismissal was substantively fair, as his absence from work was due to his own criminal conduct resulting in imprisonment. The applicant admitted to being convicted of bribery and corruption, which directly related to his employment duties. The employer's failure to hold a disciplinary hearing rendered the dismissal procedurally unfair, but this was already addressed by the arbitrator's award of compensation. The court emphasized that rigid application of distinctions between criminal and disciplinary proceedings should be avoided, and the facts of each case must be considered. Given the applicant's conviction and the nature of his work, reinstatement...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The application is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment