Moletele Community and Others v Mnisi, Khoza, Sbuyana and Munisi Communitie/Tribe Members/Families (LCC206/2010; LCC 20/2012) [2020] ZALCC 11 (3 July 2020)

Moletele Community and Others v Mnisi, Khoza, Sbuyana and Munisi Communitie/Tribe Members/Families (LCC206/2010; LCC 20/2012) [2020] ZALCC 11 (3 July 2020)

The court held that the main claimants are bound by their undertaking at the pre-trial conference to provide financial statements to the CLCC for the purpose of determining continued eligibility for State-funded legal representation. This obligation arises from both the agreement reached and statutory requirements under the Community Property Association Act. The court further ruled that the Minister is not required to file a plea, as this is not mandated by the rules or the Act, and prior agreements between the parties support this position. Regarding Telkom's Grovedale property, the court ordered that issues relating to its restoration be separated from other claims, with specific...

Citation
[2020] ZALCC 11
Parties
Applicant: Moletele Community; Applicant: Heir Prince-Maekane Tribal Community; Applicant: Kgosi Lackson Abuthi Chiloane (on behalf of Moletele Tribe); Applicant: Moletele-Blydepoort Community; Respondent: Mnisi, Khoza, Sbuyana and Munisi Communities/Tribe Members/Families; Respondent: A&V Group; Respondent: Hoedspruit landowners; Respondent: KTO Group; Respondent: Madrid Landowners; Respondent: Telkom SA SOC Ltd; Respondent: Regional Land Claims Commissioner (RLCC)
Court
Land Claims Court
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
3 July 2020
Case Number
LCC206/2010; LCC 20/2012
Procedural Posture
Land and Property Application / Pre Trial Conference and Interlocutory Rulings
Outcome
Interlocutory orders issued: main claimants required to produce financial statements; Minister not required to file a plea; separation of issues ordered for Telkom's Grovedale property only; directions issued for witness statements and further case management.
Judges
Spilg
Legal Topics
Restitution of Land Rights Act, Community Property Association Act, Pre Trial Conference Orders, Separation of Issues, Government Body Definition, Witness Statement Requirements
Land and Property Civil Procedure Administrative Law Restitution of Land Rights Act Community Property Association Act Pre Trial Conference Orders Separation of Issues Government Body Definition +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Moletele Community

Applicant

Heir Prince-Maekane Tribal Community

Applicant

Kgosi Lackson Abuthi Chiloane (on behalf of Moletele Tribe)

Applicant

Moletele-Blydepoort Community

Applicant

Mnisi, Khoza, Sbuyana and Munisi Communities/Tribe Members/Families

Respondent

A&V Group

Respondent

Hoedspruit landowners

Respondent

KTO Group

Respondent

Madrid Landowners

Respondent

Telkom SA SOC Ltd

Respondent

Regional Land Claims Commissioner (RLCC)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Land and Property Application / Pre Trial Conference and Interlocutory Rulings

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the main claimants are required to produce financial statements for funding eligibility.
  2. 2 Whether the Minister must file a plea and be separately represented.
  3. 3 Whether issues regarding Telkom's Grovedale property should be separated from other claims.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the main claimants are bound by their undertaking at the pre-trial conference to provide financial statements to the CLCC for the purpose of determining continued eligibility for State-funded legal representation. This obligation arises from both the agreement reached and statutory requirements under the Community Property Association Act. The court further ruled that the Minister is not required to file a plea, as this is not mandated by the rules or the Act, and prior agreements between the parties support this position. Regarding Telkom's Grovedale property, the court ordered that issues relating to its restoration be separated from other claims, with specific...

Court Disposition

Interlocutory orders issued: main claimants required to produce financial statements; Minister not required to file a plea; separation of issues ordered for Telkom's Grovedale property only; directions issued for witness statements and further case management.

Orders

  • The Minister is not required to plead to the Main Claimants' statement of claim.
  • Issues regarding restoration of Telkom's Grovedale property are to be separately decided from other claims; Telkom and the main claimants must clarify title and applicability of s 34 of the Restitution of Land Rights Act.