Moloi and Another v Premier of the Free State Province and Others (5556/2017) [2021] ZAFSHC 37 (28 January 2021)
The court found that the applicants failed to establish reasonable prospects of success on appeal. The agreement relied upon by the applicants was cancelled, as conceded by them, and subsequent correspondence did not evidence any revival of the agreement. The fourth affidavit was not formally admitted, as no application for its admission was made and no explanation was provided. Reference to the affidavit and lack of objection from respondents did not render it admissible. The court was entitled to disregard the affidavit. The application for leave to appeal was dismissed with costs.
- Citation
- [2021] ZAFSHC 37
- Parties
- Applicant: Mpho Sarah Moloi N.O; Applicant: Mpho Sarah Moloi; Respondent: Premier of the Free State Province; Respondent: MEC for Public Works & Infrastructure, Free State Province; Respondent: MEC for Health, Free State; Respondent: Mangaung Metropolitan Municipality
- Court
- Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 28 January 2021
- Case Number
- 5556/2017
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal to Full Court or Supreme Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- P.E. Molitsoane
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Revival of Contract, Filing of Affidavits, Court Discretion, Costs Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mpho Sarah Moloi N.O
Applicant
Mpho Sarah Moloi
Applicant
Premier of the Free State Province
Respondent
MEC for Public Works & Infrastructure, Free State Province
Respondent
MEC for Health, Free State
Respondent
Mangaung Metropolitan Municipality
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal to Full Court or Supreme Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants have reasonable prospects of success on appeal.
- 2 Whether the agreement relied upon by the applicants was revived after cancellation.
- 3 Whether the court erred in disregarding the fourth affidavit filed by the applicants.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants failed to establish reasonable prospects of success on appeal. The agreement relied upon by the applicants was cancelled, as conceded by them, and subsequent correspondence did not evidence any revival of the agreement. The fourth affidavit was not formally admitted, as no application for its admission was made and no explanation was provided. Reference to the affidavit and lack of objection from respondents did not render it admissible. The court was entitled to disregard the affidavit. The application for leave to appeal was dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment