Molokomme and Another v Premier of the North-West Province and Others (1/2000) [2000] ZANWHC 8 (5 June 2000)
The applicants contravened the relevant regulations by subletting the property and failing to pay rental and municipal charges for an extended period, which entitled the third respondent to act against them. However, the third respondent did not cancel the certificate of occupation as provided for in the regulations but instead imposed an interdict preventing the applicants from acquiring ownership. The court found no regulatory or statutory basis for the third respondent to impose such an interdict. The proper course would have been cancellation of the certificate of occupation. Furthermore, the repeal of chapter 2 of the Proclamation was not argued as a basis for the application, and...
- Citation
- [2000] ZANWHC 8
- Parties
- Applicant: Emanuel John Thabo Molokomme; Applicant: Regina Gaolatlhe Molokomme; Respondent: Premier of North West Province; Respondent: Ernest Seonyatseng Kgasoe; Respondent: Ga-Rankuwa Town Council
- Court
- North West High Court, Mafikeng
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 5 June 2000
- Case Number
- 1/2000
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application partially granted. The Deputy Director General is directed to consider the applicants' application for ownership and the interdict is uplifted. No order as to costs.
- Judges
- Mogoeng
- Legal Topics
- Certificate of Occupation, Municipal Interdict, Contravention of Regulations, Preferential Right to Purchase, Local Government Powers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Emanuel John Thabo Molokomme
Applicant
Regina Gaolatlhe Molokomme
Applicant
Premier of North West Province
Respondent
Ernest Seonyatseng Kgasoe
Respondent
Ga-Rankuwa Town Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to a preferential right to purchase and register ownership of house number 2281, Ga-Rankuwa 8.
- 2 Whether the third respondent lawfully barred the applicants from acquiring ownership by imposing an interdict.
- 3 Whether the applicants' contravention of occupation regulations justified the third respondent's actions.
Ratio Decidendi
The applicants contravened the relevant regulations by subletting the property and failing to pay rental and municipal charges for an extended period, which entitled the third respondent to act against them. However, the third respondent did not cancel the certificate of occupation as provided for in the regulations but instead imposed an interdict preventing the applicants from acquiring ownership. The court found no regulatory or statutory basis for the third respondent to impose such an interdict. The proper course would have been cancellation of the certificate of occupation. Furthermore, the repeal of chapter 2 of the Proclamation was not argued as a basis for the application, and...
Court Disposition
Application partially granted. The Deputy Director General is directed to consider the applicants' application for ownership and the interdict is uplifted. No order as to costs.
Orders
- The Deputy Director General for the Department of Local Government, Housing, Planning and Development is directed to consider the applicants' application for ownership of house number 2281, Ga-Rankuwa 8, JQ.
- The interdict imposed by the third respondent against the applicants on the aforementioned house is uplifted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment