Moncho v S (CC246/2005) [2016] ZANWHC 47 (4 August 2016)

Moncho v S (CC246/2005) [2016] ZANWHC 47 (4 August 2016)

The court found that although the delay in filing the application for leave to appeal was explained, there were no reasonable prospects that another court would reach a different conclusion regarding the sentence of life imprisonment. Consequently, condonation for the late filing was refused and the application for leave to appeal was dismissed.

Citation
[2016] ZANWHC 47
Parties
Applicant: Simon Lentikile Moncho; Respondent: The State
Court
North West High Court, Mafikeng
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
4 August 2016
Case Number
CC246/2005
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Application for condonation and leave to appeal is refused.
Judges
A A Landman
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Condonation, Life Imprisonment Sentence
Criminal Law Leave to Appeal Condonation Life Imprisonment Sentence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Simon Lentikile Moncho

Applicant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether condonation for the late filing of the application for leave to appeal should be granted.
  2. 2 Whether there are reasonable prospects that another court would reach a different conclusion regarding the sentence of life imprisonment.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that although the delay in filing the application for leave to appeal was explained, there were no reasonable prospects that another court would reach a different conclusion regarding the sentence of life imprisonment. Consequently, condonation for the late filing was refused and the application for leave to appeal was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application for condonation and leave to appeal is refused.

Orders

  • The application for condonation is refused.
  • Leave to appeal against the sentence of life imprisonment is refused.