Moodley and Others v Minister of Education and Culture, House of Delegates and Another (539/87) [1989] ZASCA 45 (31 March 1989)

Moodley and Others v Minister of Education and Culture, House of Delegates and Another (539/87) [1989] ZASCA 45 (31 March 1989)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the termination of the appellants' employment was lawful under Regulation 10 of the regulations governing teachers in State and State-aided schools for Indians. Probationary and temporary teachers do not fall within the category of persons appointed 'in a permanent capacity' as contemplated by section 15(1) of the Indians Education Act, and thus the elaborate procedures for discharge under sections 17 and 18 do not apply. The Minister's discretion to terminate employment under Regulation 10 is broad and does not require the assignment of reasons or adherence to the principles of natural justice, such as a hearing, unless the statute or regulation...

Citation
[1989] ZASCA 45
Parties
Appellant: Thienadayalin Moodley; Appellant: Lenny Jayalall; Appellant: Rajanthran Konar; Appellant: Marie Therese Antoinette Naidoo; Appellant: Kaviraj Surajpal Dilraj; Appellant: Edmund Harold Jacob; Appellant: Moonsamy Vijayan Allen; Appellant: Theresa Paliathan; Appellant: Osman Gany Sadeck; Appellant: Stephen Morris David; Appellant: Thavananthan Pillay; Respondent: Minister of Education and Culture, House of Delegates; Respondent: Executive Director: Department of Education and Culture Administration: House of Delegates
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
31 March 1989
Case Number
539/87
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From the Natal Provincial Division After Dismissal of Application for Reinstatement and Setting Aside Termination of Employment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel.
Judges
Corbett, Hoexter, Botha, Kumleben, Eksteen
Legal Topics
Termination of Employment, Procedural Fairness, Audi Alteram Partem, Delegation of Powers, Probationary Employment
Administrative Law Labour Law Termination of Employment Procedural Fairness Audi Alteram Partem Delegation of Powers Probationary Employment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Thienadayalin Moodley

Appellant

Lenny Jayalall

Appellant

Rajanthran Konar

Appellant

Marie Therese Antoinette Naidoo

Appellant

Kaviraj Surajpal Dilraj

Appellant

Edmund Harold Jacob

Appellant

Moonsamy Vijayan Allen

Appellant

Theresa Paliathan

Appellant

Osman Gany Sadeck

Appellant

Stephen Morris David

Appellant

Thavananthan Pillay

Appellant

Minister of Education and Culture, House of Delegates

Respondent

Executive Director: Department of Education and Culture Administration: House of Delegates

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From the Natal Provincial Division After Dismissal of Application for Reinstatement and Setting Aside Termination of Employment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the termination of the appellants' employment was lawful under the relevant regulations and the Indians Education Act.
  2. 2 Whether the procedures prescribed by sections 17 and 18 of the Act applied to probationary and temporary teachers.
  3. 3 Whether the principles of natural justice, specifically audi alteram partem, required a hearing before termination.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the termination of the appellants' employment was lawful under Regulation 10 of the regulations governing teachers in State and State-aided schools for Indians. Probationary and temporary teachers do not fall within the category of persons appointed 'in a permanent capacity' as contemplated by section 15(1) of the Indians Education Act, and thus the elaborate procedures for discharge under sections 17 and 18 do not apply. The Minister's discretion to terminate employment under Regulation 10 is broad and does not require the assignment of reasons or adherence to the principles of natural justice, such as a hearing, unless the statute or regulation...

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel.

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed with costs, including the costs of two counsel.