Morapeng Afrika Leisure (Pty) Ltd v Nengondeni and Others (JR3054/2012) [2015] ZALCJHB 323 (7 August 2015)
The court found that the grounds for leave to appeal did not have a reasonable prospect of success. There was no compelling reason for the appeal to be heard. The compensation and costs orders were made in accordance with the law and the facts as determined in the review judgment. The application for leave to appeal...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] ZALCJHB 323
- Parties
- Applicant: Morapeng a'Afrika Leisure (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Khathutshelo Nengondeni; Respondent: Commissioner Themba Hlatswayo; Respondent: CCMA
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Case Number
- JR3054/2012
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Review Judgment
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- Coetzee
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Unfair Dismissal, Compensation, Costs Award
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Morapeng a'Afrika Leisure (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Khathutshelo Nengondeni
Respondent
Commissioner Themba Hlatswayo
Respondent
CCMA
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Review Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has reasonable prospects of success on appeal against the compensation and costs orders.
- 2 Whether there is a compelling reason for the appeal to be heard.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the grounds for leave to appeal did not have a reasonable prospect of success. There was no compelling reason for the appeal to be heard. The compensation and costs orders were made in accordance with the law and the facts as determined in the review judgment. The application for leave to appeal was therefore dismissed, and the applicant was ordered to pay the costs of the application.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
- The applicant is ordered to pay the costs of the application for leave to appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
49 paragraphs
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG
JUDGMENT
Case no: JR3054/2012
DATE: 07 AUGUST 2015
Not Reportable
In the matter between
MORAPENG a'AFRIKA LEISURE (Pty) Ltd......................................................................Appellant
And
KHATHUTSHELO NENGONDENI..........................................................................First Respondent
Commissioner THEMBA HLATSWAYO...............................................................Second Respondent
CCMA..........................................................................................................................Third Respondent
Application: 3 June 2015
Delivered: 7 August 2015
APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL
COETZEE AJ
[1] The Appellant is Morapeng a'Afrika Leisure (Pty).
[2] The First Respondent is Kathutshelo Ngongeni ("the Respondent")
[3] The Applicant applied to Court to review and set aside an arbitration award in terms whereof the dismissal of the Respondent was found to be unfair and he was consequently reinstated.
[4] The parties informed the Court that the Court should exercise a discretion in the granting of compensation should the Court be inclined to review and set aside part of the award but found that the dismissal was procedurally unfair.
[5] After hearing the parties the following order was made:
'ORDER
1 The Arbitration award dated 6 December 2012 made by the Second Respondent under CCMA case number GAJB21941/2012 is set aside.
2 The findings of the Second Respondent are substituted with a finding that the dismissal of the First Respondent was substantively fair but procedurally unfair.
3 The Applicant must pay the First Respondent a total amount of R54 072.45 within fourteen days of this order.
4 There is no order as to costs.'
[6] The Applicant applied for leave to appeal against paragraphs three and four of the order.
[7] The Applicant and the First Respondent filed written submissions which were considered in chambers.
[8] Section 17 of the Superior Courts Act, No 10 of 2013 regulates an application for leave to appeal from a decision of a High Court. It reads as follows:
'17. Leave to appeal.—
(1) Leave to appeal may only be given where the judge or judges concerned are of the opinion that—
(a) (i) the appeal would have a reasonable prospect of success; or
(ii) there is some other compelling reason why the appeal should be heard, including conflicting judgments on the matter under consideration;
(b) the decision sought on appeal does not fall within the ambit of section 16 (2) (a); and
(c) where the decision sought to be appealed does not dispose of all the issues in the case, the appeal would lead to a just and prompt
resolution of the real issues between the parties'.
[9] This section also applies to applications for leave to appeal in the Labour Court.[1]
[10] The grounds for leave to appeal do not have a reasonable prospect of success. There is no compelling reason an appeal should be heard.
[11] The following order is made:
1 The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
2 The Applicant is ordered to pay the costs of the application for leave to appeal.
Coetzee AJ
Acting judge of the Labour Court of South Africa
APPEARANCES:
For the applicant: No appearance - In chambers
Instructed by: Patrick O'Donovan
For the First Respondent: No appearance - In chambers
Instructed by: Nkosi Ntlantla Inc
6958712v1
[1] Section 151 of the Labour Relations Act, Act 66 of 1995