Moroeroe obo T.T.M v Member of the Executive Council for Health, Free State Province (6218/2018) [2021] ZAFSHC 361 (21 July 2021)
The court found that the applicant did not serve a section 3 notice in respect of her personal claim, as the notice dated 8 August 2017 only referred to the minor child's claim. The applicant failed to provide any explanation for the three-year delay in bringing the condonation application after the respondent's special plea. The absence of notice and substantiation of the personal claim meant the respondent could not properly meet the case. The court held that it would be impermissible to read into the notice a claim not mentioned therein or to craft a claim on the applicant's behalf. Accordingly, condonation for the applicant's personal claim was refused, while condonation for the minor...
- Citation
- [2021] ZAFSHC 361
- Parties
- Applicant: Nthabiseng Moroeroe obo T[....] T[....] M[....]; Respondent: Member of the Executive Council for Health, Free State Province
- Court
- Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 21 July 2021
- Case Number
- 6218/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Condonation Application / Application for Condonation and Declaratory Relief Prior to Trial
- Outcome
- Condonation for late service of the section 3 notice is granted for the minor child's claim; the application for declaratory relief and condonation in respect of the applicant's personal claim is dismissed.
- Judges
- Naidoo
- Legal Topics
- Institution of Legal Proceedings Against Organs of State Act, Condonation for Late Notice, Personal Injury, Medical Negligence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nthabiseng Moroeroe obo T[....] T[....] M[....]
Applicant
Member of the Executive Council for Health, Free State Province
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Condonation Application / Application for Condonation and Declaratory Relief Prior to Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant complied with section 3 of the Institution of Legal Proceedings Against Certain Organs of State Act 40 of 2002 in respect of her personal claim.
- 2 Whether the failure to comply with section 3 should be condoned for the applicant's personal claim.
- 3 Whether condonation should be granted for the late service of the section 3 notice in respect of the minor child's claim.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant did not serve a section 3 notice in respect of her personal claim, as the notice dated 8 August 2017 only referred to the minor child's claim. The applicant failed to provide any explanation for the three-year delay in bringing the condonation application after the respondent's special plea. The absence of notice and substantiation of the personal claim meant the respondent could not properly meet the case. The court held that it would be impermissible to read into the notice a claim not mentioned therein or to craft a claim on the applicant's behalf. Accordingly, condonation for the applicant's personal claim was refused, while condonation for the minor...
Court Disposition
Condonation for late service of the section 3 notice is granted for the minor child's claim; the application for declaratory relief and condonation in respect of the applicant's personal claim is dismissed.
Orders
- The late service by the applicant of the notice of her intention to institute legal proceedings in terms of section 3 of the Institution of Legal Proceedings Against Certain Organs of State Act 40 of 2002, on behalf of the minor child T[....] T[....] Moroeroe, is condoned.
- The application by the applicant, in respect of her claim in her personal capacity, for an order declaring that she has complied with the provisions of the Legal Proceedings Against Certain Organs of State Act 40 of 2002, alternatively condonation for late service of the notice in terms of the said Act, is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment