Morudu and Others v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration and Others (JR1735/2021) [2024] ZALCJHB 522 (25 October 2024)
The Commissioner committed a gross irregularity by failing to hear evidence from the Applicants regarding their employment status, despite the existence of a factual dispute. The Commissioner relied solely on evidence from the Respondents and written submissions, without affording the Applicants an opportunity to present their case. This procedural failure rendered the jurisdictional ruling unsound. Furthermore, the Applicants provided a reasonable explanation for the late filing of the Rule 7A(8) notice, supported by medical evidence of the attorney's hospitalisation, and no prejudice was suffered by the Respondents. Accordingly, condonation is granted, the jurisdictional ruling is...
- Citation
- [2024] ZALCJHB 522
- Parties
- Applicant: Jacob Morudu and 309 Others; Respondent: Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration; Respondent: Commissioner Len Dekker N.O.; Respondent: University of South Africa
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 25 October 2024
- Case Number
- JR1735/2021
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Opposed Application for Review of CCMA Jurisdictional Ruling; Condonation for Late Filing Considered and Granted
- Outcome
- Condonation granted; jurisdictional ruling reviewed and set aside; matter remitted for rehearing before a different Commissioner; no order as to costs.
- Judges
- Adams
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Ccma, Employee Vs Independent Contractor, Condonation for Late Filing, Gross Irregularity, Remittal for Rehearing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jacob Morudu and 309 Others
Applicant
Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration
Respondent
Commissioner Len Dekker N.O.
Respondent
University of South Africa
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Opposed Application for Review of CCMA Jurisdictional Ruling; Condonation for Late Filing Considered and Granted
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the CCMA had jurisdiction to entertain the dispute between the parties.
- 2 Whether the Applicants were employees or independent contractors.
- 3 Whether the Commissioner committed a gross irregularity by failing to hear evidence from the Applicants.
Ratio Decidendi
The Commissioner committed a gross irregularity by failing to hear evidence from the Applicants regarding their employment status, despite the existence of a factual dispute. The Commissioner relied solely on evidence from the Respondents and written submissions, without affording the Applicants an opportunity to present their case. This procedural failure rendered the jurisdictional ruling unsound. Furthermore, the Applicants provided a reasonable explanation for the late filing of the Rule 7A(8) notice, supported by medical evidence of the attorney's hospitalisation, and no prejudice was suffered by the Respondents. Accordingly, condonation is granted, the jurisdictional ruling is...
Court Disposition
Condonation granted; jurisdictional ruling reviewed and set aside; matter remitted for rehearing before a different Commissioner; no order as to costs.
Orders
- Condonation for non-compliance with Labour Court Rule 7A(8) is granted.
- The ruling made by the Second Respondent on 21 July 2021 under case number CCMA GATW16355/20 is reviewed and set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment