Moruleng and District Taxi Association and Another v North West Provincial Department of Transport and Others (254/10) [2011] ZASCA 138 (23 September 2011)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the conversion of radius-based permits into route-based operating licences for the disputed Moruleng–Mogwase route did not comply with the peremptory requirements of section 80 of the National Land Transport Transition Act. The evidence showed that members of the fourth respondent did not render a transport service on the disputed route for at least 180 days prior to their application for conversion, and this was conceded in affidavits. The Board was not provided with sufficient proof of regular service as required by section 80(2). The court found that the statutory requirements for conversion were jurisdictional facts and that non-compliance...
- Citation
- [2011] ZASCA 138
- Parties
- Appellant: Moruleng and District Taxi Association; Appellant: Johannes Boitumelo Mokatse; Respondent: North West Provincial Department of Transport; Respondent: Mogwase Taxi Association
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 23 September 2011
- Case Number
- 254/10
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Full Bench of North West High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; decisions to grant operating licences to members of the fourth respondent for the disputed route reviewed and set aside.
- Judges
- Harms, Maya, Bosielo, Shongwe, Plasket
- Legal Topics
- Review of Administrative Action, Conversion of Transport Permits, Operating Licence Requirements, Promotion of Administrative Justice Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Moruleng and District Taxi Association
Appellant
Johannes Boitumelo Mokatse
Appellant
North West Provincial Department of Transport
Respondent
Mogwase Taxi Association
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Full Bench of North West High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conversion of radius-based permits into route-based operating licences for the disputed route complied with the requirements of the National Land Transport Transition Act.
- 2 Whether the applicants for conversion rendered a transport service on the disputed route for at least 180 days prior to application, as required by section 80(1) of the NLTTA.
- 3 Whether the Board was provided with sufficient proof of regular service as required by section 80(2) of the NLTTA.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the conversion of radius-based permits into route-based operating licences for the disputed Moruleng–Mogwase route did not comply with the peremptory requirements of section 80 of the National Land Transport Transition Act. The evidence showed that members of the fourth respondent did not render a transport service on the disputed route for at least 180 days prior to their application for conversion, and this was conceded in affidavits. The Board was not provided with sufficient proof of regular service as required by section 80(2). The court found that the statutory requirements for conversion were jurisdictional facts and that non-compliance...
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; decisions to grant operating licences to members of the fourth respondent for the disputed route reviewed and set aside.
Orders
- The appeal is upheld.
- The fourth to twenty fourth respondents and the twenty sixth respondent shall pay the appellants’ costs, including the costs of two counsel, jointly and severally, the one paying, the others to be absolved.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment