Moshoeshoe and Another v Firstrand Bank Ltd and Others (40290/12) [2018] ZAGPJHC 8; [2018] 2 All SA 236 (GJ) (25 January 2018)
The court found that the applicants were never properly served with the summons due to an incorrect address, resulting in their ignorance of the proceedings and default judgment. The subsequent sale in execution and eviction occurred without proper judicial oversight and in circumstances that were unfair and unjust. The applicants provided a reasonable explanation for their default, acted bona fide, and demonstrated a bona fide case with prospects of success in overturning the Registrar's order. The arguments of res judicata and lis pendens raised by the bank were dismissed, as the order of Dodson AJ was granted without consideration of the merits and is therefore susceptible to...
- Citation
- [2018] ZAGPJHC 8
- Parties
- Applicant: Moshoeshoe GT; Applicant: Moshoeshoe EM; Respondent: Firstrand Bank Ltd; Respondent: Seponono AM; Respondent: Mathapelo JS; Respondent: Ngcobo J; Respondent: The Sheriff of the High Court, Benoni
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 25 January 2018
- Case Number
- 40290/12
- Procedural Posture
- Rescission Application / Application for Rescission of a Default Judgment and Condonation for Late Filing
- Outcome
- Application for rescission granted; judgment and order of Dodson AJ rescinded and set aside.
- Judges
- Vally
- Legal Topics
- Rescission of Judgment, Service of Process, Condonation, Sale in Execution, Mortgage Foreclosure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Moshoeshoe GT
Applicant
Moshoeshoe EM
Applicant
Firstrand Bank Ltd
Respondent
Seponono AM
Respondent
Mathapelo JS
Respondent
Ngcobo J
Respondent
The Sheriff of the High Court, Benoni
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Rescission Application / Application for Rescission of a Default Judgment and Condonation for Late Filing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants have shown good cause for rescission of the default judgment granted by Dodson AJ.
- 2 Whether the applicants provided a reasonable explanation for their default and acted bona fide.
- 3 Whether the order of Dodson AJ is susceptible to rescission or is res judicata.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants were never properly served with the summons due to an incorrect address, resulting in their ignorance of the proceedings and default judgment. The subsequent sale in execution and eviction occurred without proper judicial oversight and in circumstances that were unfair and unjust. The applicants provided a reasonable explanation for their default, acted bona fide, and demonstrated a bona fide case with prospects of success in overturning the Registrar's order. The arguments of res judicata and lis pendens raised by the bank were dismissed, as the order of Dodson AJ was granted without consideration of the merits and is therefore susceptible to...
Court Disposition
Application for rescission granted; judgment and order of Dodson AJ rescinded and set aside.
Orders
- Non-compliance with rules of the Court is condoned.
- The judgment and order of Dodson AJ issued on 27 January 2014 is rescinded and set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment