Motaung v Minister of Police (1838/2020) [2024] ZAFSHC 358 (5 November 2024)
The court found that the plaintiff was wrongfully and negligently shot by members of the South African Police Services, resulting in physical injury and loss of income. Liability was settled at 100% in favour of the plaintiff. The court considered expert medical evidence regarding scarring and future medical needs, as well as actuarial calculations for loss of earnings. Applying appropriate contingencies and judicial discretion, the court determined the quantum for general damages, future medical expenses, assistive devices, and loss of income. The defendant was ordered to pay the plaintiff the specified amounts and costs.
- Citation
- [2024] ZAFSHC 358
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Gloria Tholwana Motaung; Defendant: The Minister of Police
- Court
- Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 5 November 2024
- Case Number
- 1838/2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Trial / Quantum of Damages
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claim for damages is upheld; defendant ordered to pay specified amounts and costs.
- Judges
- Nemavhidi
- Legal Topics
- Wrongful Shooting, Negligence, General Damages, Loss of Income, Future Medical Expenses
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gloria Tholwana Motaung
Plaintiff
The Minister of Police
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Quantum of Damages
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to damages for wrongful and negligent shooting by police officers.
- 2 What is the appropriate quantum for general damages, future medical expenses, assistive devices, and loss of income.
- 3 How contingencies should be applied to actuarial calculations for loss of earnings.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff was wrongfully and negligently shot by members of the South African Police Services, resulting in physical injury and loss of income. Liability was settled at 100% in favour of the plaintiff. The court considered expert medical evidence regarding scarring and future medical needs, as well as actuarial calculations for loss of earnings. Applying appropriate contingencies and judicial discretion, the court determined the quantum for general damages, future medical expenses, assistive devices, and loss of income. The defendant was ordered to pay the plaintiff the specified amounts and costs.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claim for damages is upheld; defendant ordered to pay specified amounts and costs.
Orders
- Defendant shall pay the plaintiff general damages of R250,000.00.
- Defendant shall pay the plaintiff future medical and hospital expenses of R91,800.00.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment