Mouton and Others v 8 Mile Investments 503 (Pty) Ltd and Another (21545/2022) [2023] ZAGPJHC 990 (1 September 2023)
The applicants, as trustees of a shareholder trust, sought inspection of the company's signed annual audited financial statements and other records under section 26 of the Companies Act and a shareholders agreement. The respondents denied the existence of a binding shareholders agreement, and no replying affidavit was filed, so the respondents' version prevailed. The applicants attempted to amend their relief in heads of argument without proper notice, which is irregular and not permitted by court rules. At the hearing, the claim was reduced to only the signed financial statements for 2021, but evidence showed these had already been provided to the applicants' former attorney in October...
- Citation
- [2023] ZAGPJHC 990
- Parties
- Applicant: Karel Petrus Mouton; Applicant: Andre Mouton; Applicant: Petrus Cornelius Norval; Respondent: 8 Mile Investments 503 (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Attentus Accounting and Tax Solutions CC
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 1 September 2023
- Case Number
- 21545/2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- C H J Badenhorst
- Legal Topics
- Companies Act Section 26, Shareholder Rights, Inspection of Company Records, Civil Procedure Amendment of Relief
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Karel Petrus Mouton
Applicant
Andre Mouton
Applicant
Petrus Cornelius Norval
Applicant
8 Mile Investments 503 (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Attentus Accounting and Tax Solutions CC
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants, as trustees of a shareholder trust, are entitled to inspect and copy the signed annual audited financial statements and other financial records of the first respondent company under section 26 of the Companies Act and/or a shareholders agreement.
- 2 Whether the relief sought by the applicants can be amended or reduced at the hearing without proper notice or compliance with court rules.
- 3 Whether the first respondent is obliged to provide audited financial statements or only signed financial statements.
Ratio Decidendi
The applicants, as trustees of a shareholder trust, sought inspection of the company's signed annual audited financial statements and other records under section 26 of the Companies Act and a shareholders agreement. The respondents denied the existence of a binding shareholders agreement, and no replying affidavit was filed, so the respondents' version prevailed. The applicants attempted to amend their relief in heads of argument without proper notice, which is irregular and not permitted by court rules. At the hearing, the claim was reduced to only the signed financial statements for 2021, but evidence showed these had already been provided to the applicants' former attorney in October...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The application is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment