Mpambani v Sekununu Construction and Trading CC and Others (3959/2008) [2008] ZAFSHC 81 (14 August 2008)

Mpambani v Sekununu Construction and Trading CC and Others (3959/2008) [2008] ZAFSHC 81 (14 August 2008)

The court found that the contract between the applicant and the first respondent expressly contemplated the situation of an uncompleted project at the expiry of the initial 12-month period. Clause 5.1.4 of the contract provides that, in such circumstances, the accounting and commission provisions remain applicable until project completion. The evidence showed that the applicant had not terminated his involvement with the project, and the respondents' actions in diverting funds and attempting to exclude the applicant from account control constituted ongoing infringement of the applicant's contractual rights. The court held that no adequate alternative remedy was available and that the...

Citation
[2008] ZAFSHC 81
Parties
Applicant: Ignatius Mpambani; Respondent: Sekununu Construction and Trading CC; Respondent: Samuel Selikoe; Respondent: Tswelopele Municipality; Respondent: ABSA Bank Ltd; Respondent: Standard Bank Ltd
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
14 August 2008
Case Number
3959/2008
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Return Date of Rule Nisi; Application for Final Interdict
Outcome
Final interdict granted in favour of the applicant; costs awarded against first and second respondents jointly and severally.
Judges
C.H.G. Van der Merwe
Legal Topics
Final Interdict, Contractual Rights, Breach of Contract, Public Tender, Bank Account Control

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ignatius Mpambani

Applicant

Sekununu Construction and Trading CC

Respondent

Samuel Selikoe

Respondent

Tswelopele Municipality

Respondent

ABSA Bank Ltd

Respondent

Standard Bank Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Urgent Application / Return Date of Rule Nisi; Application for Final Interdict

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a final interdict enforcing contractual rights over the project and related bank accounts.
  2. 2 Whether the contract between the applicant and first respondent remains applicable to the uncompleted project after expiry of the initial 12-month period.
  3. 3 Whether the respondents breached the contract by diverting project funds and excluding the applicant from account control.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the contract between the applicant and the first respondent expressly contemplated the situation of an uncompleted project at the expiry of the initial 12-month period. Clause 5.1.4 of the contract provides that, in such circumstances, the accounting and commission provisions remain applicable until project completion. The evidence showed that the applicant had not terminated his involvement with the project, and the respondents' actions in diverting funds and attempting to exclude the applicant from account control constituted ongoing infringement of the applicant's contractual rights. The court held that no adequate alternative remedy was available and that the...

Court Disposition

Final interdict granted in favour of the applicant; costs awarded against first and second respondents jointly and severally.

Orders

  • The third respondent is ordered to pay any amounts due in respect of contract NS29/2007 directly into the first respondent's account with Standard Bank (account number 040177793).
  • ABSA Bank Ltd is interdicted from allowing withdrawals or transfers from the first respondent's account (4068885278) that would reduce the balance below R698,120.68 without written authorisation from the applicant.