Mpemba and Another v Lukhanji Municipality and Others (902/2009) [2009] ZAECGHC 25 (6 May 2009)
The application was rendered moot by the ANC's last-minute withdrawal of the expulsion, and no substantive relief was sought against any respondent. The applicants failed to establish a prima facie right to interim relief against the municipality or its manager, as their actions were governed by statute and not shown to be unlawful. The applicants were ordered to pay the costs of the municipality and its manager, jointly and severally, as they were unsuccessful in their opposition. The issue of costs against the ANC was reserved for later determination, given the uncertainty arising from the settlement correspondence.
- Citation
- [2009] ZAECGHC 25
- Parties
- Applicant: Samuel Duncan Mpemba; Applicant: Nomazotsho Kopolo; Respondent: Lukhanji Municipality; Respondent: Municipal Manager, Lukhanji Municipality; Respondent: African National Congress, Chris Hani Region; Respondent: Independent Electoral Commission
- Court
- Eastern Cape High Court, Grahamstown
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 6 May 2009
- Case Number
- 902/2009
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Application for Interim Interdict Pending Review; Withdrawn After Expulsion Rescinded
- Outcome
- Application withdrawn; applicants ordered to pay costs of municipality and municipal manager; costs against ANC reserved for later determination.
- Judges
- Jones
- Legal Topics
- Interim Interdict, Expulsion From Political Party, Municipal Structures Act, Procedural Fairness, Costs Award
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Samuel Duncan Mpemba
Applicant
Nomazotsho Kopolo
Applicant
Lukhanji Municipality
Respondent
Municipal Manager, Lukhanji Municipality
Respondent
African National Congress, Chris Hani Region
Respondent
Independent Electoral Commission
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application for Interim Interdict Pending Review; Withdrawn After Expulsion Rescinded
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants' expulsion from the ANC and consequent removal as councillors was procedurally fair and lawful.
- 2 Whether the requirements for an interim interdict pending review were met against the municipality and its officials.
- 3 Whether the applicants or the ANC should bear the costs of the application after the expulsion was rescinded.
Ratio Decidendi
The application was rendered moot by the ANC's last-minute withdrawal of the expulsion, and no substantive relief was sought against any respondent. The applicants failed to establish a prima facie right to interim relief against the municipality or its manager, as their actions were governed by statute and not shown to be unlawful. The applicants were ordered to pay the costs of the municipality and its manager, jointly and severally, as they were unsuccessful in their opposition. The issue of costs against the ANC was reserved for later determination, given the uncertainty arising from the settlement correspondence.
Court Disposition
Application withdrawn; applicants ordered to pay costs of municipality and municipal manager; costs against ANC reserved for later determination.
Orders
- The applicants are ordered to pay the 1st and 2nd respondents' costs jointly and severally, the one paying the other to be absolved.
- The issue of the applicants' and the 1st and 2nd respondents' entitlement to a costs order against the 3rd respondent is reserved and may be set down for hearing by any interested party on 10 days' notice to the other parties.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment