Mphahlele and Others v Pan Africanist Congress of Azania of Another (8340/2016) [2016] ZAGPPHC 485 (21 June 2016)
The court found that the order made on 20 April 2016 was final in respect of the participation of the parties in the upcoming local government elections and thus appealable. However, the grounds for leave to appeal were unmeritorious. Mr Mphahlele's expulsion from the PAC was upheld by the Full Court, and he had not taken steps to challenge that decision. The principle that invalid administrative action cannot simply be ignored was applied by analogy, confirming the finality of the expulsion. The Electoral Commission's decision to suspend funding was provisional and did not require a court order to be set aside. The test for leave to appeal under s 17 of the Superior Courts Act sets a...
- Citation
- [2016] ZAGPPHC 485
- Parties
- Applicant: Letlapa Mphahlele; Applicant: Pan Africanist Congress of Azania; Applicant: Mr Mphethi; Respondent: Pan Africanist Congress of Azania; Respondent: Independent Electoral Commission of South Africa
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 21 June 2016
- Case Number
- 8340/2016
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Judgment and Order Delivered on 20 April 2016.
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs for Mr Mphahlele; application by Mr Mphethi struck from the roll with costs.
- Judges
- T M Makgoka
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Appealability of Interim Orders, Judicial Precedent, Expulsion From Political Party, Electoral Commission Decisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Letlapa Mphahlele
Applicant
Pan Africanist Congress of Azania
Applicant
Mr Mphethi
Applicant
Pan Africanist Congress of Azania
Respondent
Independent Electoral Commission of South Africa
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Judgment and Order Delivered on 20 April 2016.
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the order of 20 April 2016 is appealable as a final order.
- 2 Whether the expulsion of Mr Mphahlele from the PAC can be ignored for purposes of the Electoral Commission's communication.
- 3 Whether the court erred in granting the order without setting aside the Electoral Commission's provisional decision on funding.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the order made on 20 April 2016 was final in respect of the participation of the parties in the upcoming local government elections and thus appealable. However, the grounds for leave to appeal were unmeritorious. Mr Mphahlele's expulsion from the PAC was upheld by the Full Court, and he had not taken steps to challenge that decision. The principle that invalid administrative action cannot simply be ignored was applied by analogy, confirming the finality of the expulsion. The Electoral Commission's decision to suspend funding was provisional and did not require a court order to be set aside. The test for leave to appeal under s 17 of the Superior Courts Act sets a...
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs for Mr Mphahlele; application by Mr Mphethi struck from the roll with costs.
Orders
- The application by Mr Letlapa Mphahlele for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.
- The application by Mr Mphethi for leave to appeal is struck from the roll with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment