Mpofu v South African Broadcasting Corp Limited (SABC) and Others (2008/18386) [2008] ZAGPHC 413 (16 September 2008)
The court found that the SABC Board, not the Minister, is the proper authority to appoint, suspend, and discipline the Group Chief Executive Officer, subject to the Minister's approval of the employment contract. The Broadcasting Act and the articles of association do not confer employment powers on the Minister; the Board manages and controls the affairs of the SABC and is empowered to take disciplinary action against executive employees. The applicant's suspension and the institution of disciplinary proceedings were lawful exercises of the Board's powers. The appointment of the acting GCEO was a delegation of powers, not a formal appointment requiring executive director status, and the...
- Citation
- [2008] ZAGPHC 413
- Parties
- Applicant: Daluxolo Mpofu; Respondent: South African Broadcasting Corp Limited (SABC); Respondent: Chairperson: The Board of SABC; Respondent: Gabriel Mampone NO; Respondent: The President of the Republic of South Africa; Respondent: Minister of Communications
- Court
- High Courts - Gauteng
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 16 September 2008
- Case Number
- 2008/18386
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Final Judgment on Review Application After Urgent and Interim Reliefs Were Previously Dismissed
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs, including reserved costs from the previous hearing.
- Judges
- Malan
- Legal Topics
- Principle of Legality, Powers of Board of Directors, Executive Employment Contracts, Suspension and Disciplinary Procedure, Locus Standi, Jurisdiction of Labour Court
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Daluxolo Mpofu
Applicant
South African Broadcasting Corp Limited (SABC)
Respondent
Chairperson: The Board of SABC
Respondent
Gabriel Mampone NO
Respondent
The President of the Republic of South Africa
Respondent
Minister of Communications
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Final Judgment on Review Application After Urgent and Interim Reliefs Were Previously Dismissed
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the SABC Board had the legal power to suspend the applicant and institute disciplinary proceedings against him as Group Chief Executive Officer.
- 2 Whether the appointment of the third respondent as acting GCEO was lawful under the articles of association.
- 3 Whether the Minister or the Board is the proper authority to appoint, suspend, or dismiss the GCEO.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the SABC Board, not the Minister, is the proper authority to appoint, suspend, and discipline the Group Chief Executive Officer, subject to the Minister's approval of the employment contract. The Broadcasting Act and the articles of association do not confer employment powers on the Minister; the Board manages and controls the affairs of the SABC and is empowered to take disciplinary action against executive employees. The applicant's suspension and the institution of disciplinary proceedings were lawful exercises of the Board's powers. The appointment of the acting GCEO was a delegation of powers, not a formal appointment requiring executive director status, and the...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs, including reserved costs from the previous hearing.
Orders
- The application is dismissed with costs, including the costs reserved by Gildenhuys J in relation to the hearing of 8 to 10 July 2008, such costs to include the costs of two counsel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment