Mpofu v South African Broadcasting Corporation Ltd and Others (13815/2008) [2008] ZAGPHC 144 (19 May 2008)

Mpofu v South African Broadcasting Corporation Ltd and Others (13815/2008) [2008] ZAGPHC 144 (19 May 2008)

The court found that the meeting of 6 May 2008 was not a properly constituted Board meeting as required by the Broadcasting Act, Charter, Articles, and Protocol. The deliberate exclusion of the executive directors, including the applicant, rendered the meeting unlawful. Consequently, any decisions or resolutions taken at that meeting, including the suspension of the applicant, were invalid and of no force and effect. The court further held that the conduct of the Chairperson and the Board fell short of the standards required of directors, justifying a punitive costs order against the first and second respondents.

Citation
[2008] ZAGPHC 144
Parties
Applicant: Dali Mpofu; Respondent: South African Broadcasting Corporation Ltd; Respondent: Chairperson: Board of the Corporation Ltd; Respondent: Mampone NO
Court
High Courts - Gauteng
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
19 May 2008
Case Number
13815/2008
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / First Instance
Outcome
Application granted. The meeting of 6 May 2008 is declared unlawful; all decisions and resolutions taken at that meeting, including the suspension of the applicant, are invalid and of no force and effect. Costs awarded on attorney and own client scale, including costs of two counsel, against the first and second...
Judges
Tsoka
Legal Topics
Board Composition, Quorum Requirements, Unlawful Suspension, Corporate Governance, Punitive Costs, Broadcasting Act

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dali Mpofu

Applicant

South African Broadcasting Corporation Ltd

Respondent

Chairperson: Board of the Corporation Ltd

Respondent

Mampone NO

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Urgent Application / First Instance

  1. 1 Whether the application is urgent and should be heard on an urgent basis.
  2. 2 Whether the Board meeting of 6 May 2008 was properly constituted in terms of the Broadcasting Act and related instruments.
  3. 3 Whether the decision to suspend the applicant was valid and lawful.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the meeting of 6 May 2008 was not a properly constituted Board meeting as required by the Broadcasting Act, Charter, Articles, and Protocol. The deliberate exclusion of the executive directors, including the applicant, rendered the meeting unlawful. Consequently, any decisions or resolutions taken at that meeting, including the suspension of the applicant, were invalid and of no force and effect. The court further held that the conduct of the Chairperson and the Board fell short of the standards required of directors, justifying a punitive costs order against the first and second respondents.

Court Disposition

Application granted. The meeting of 6 May 2008 is declared unlawful; all decisions and resolutions taken at that meeting, including the suspension of the applicant, are invalid and of no force and effect. Costs awarded on attorney and own client scale, including costs of two counsel, against the first and second...

Orders

  • The meeting of the Board of South African Broadcasting Corporation Limited held on 6 May 2008 is declared unlawful.
  • Any decision taken, including the decision to suspend the applicant at the Board meeting on 6 May 2008, is declared invalid and of no force and effect.