M.P.T.M and Another v Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development and Others (2025-018563) [2025] ZAGPJHC 325 (28 March 2025)
The court found that the applicants established a prima facie right to protection from harm and intimidation, based on credible evidence linking Lt. Col. Gafoor to repeated, serious threats. The respondents failed to cast serious doubt on this evidence, and the applicants' apprehension of harm was reasonable,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] ZAGPJHC 325
- Parties
- Applicant: M[...] P[...] T[...] M[...]; Applicant: S[...] E[...] M[...]; Respondent: Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development; Respondent: Director, Office of Witness Protection, Limpopo Region; Respondent: National Director of Public Prosecutions; Respondent: Director of Public Prosecutions, Gauteng Local Division; Respondent: Minister of Police; Respondent: John Henry Ffennel Nicholas
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 28 March 2025
- Case Number
- 2025-018563
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Interim Relief and Joinder; Rule Nisi Issued
- Outcome
- Interim interdict granted; rule nisi issued; Lt. Col. Gafoor joined as respondent; costs reserved.
- Judges
- S D J Wilson
- Legal Topics
- Interim Interdict, Urgent Application, Witness Protection, Harassment, Joinder of Parties
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M[...] P[...] T[...] M[...]
Applicant
S[...] E[...] M[...]
Applicant
Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development
Respondent
Director, Office of Witness Protection, Limpopo Region
Respondent
National Director of Public Prosecutions
Respondent
Director of Public Prosecutions, Gauteng Local Division
Respondent
Minister of Police
Respondent
John Henry Ffennel Nicholas
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Interim Relief and Joinder; Rule Nisi Issued
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to urgent interim interdictory relief restraining police officers, specifically Lt. Col. Gafoor, from threatening or harming them.
- 2 Whether sufficient prima facie evidence exists linking Lt. Col. Gafoor to the threats against the applicants.
- 3 Whether the matter is sufficiently urgent given the timing of the threats and the applicants' impending eviction.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants established a prima facie right to protection from harm and intimidation, based on credible evidence linking Lt. Col. Gafoor to repeated, serious threats. The respondents failed to cast serious doubt on this evidence, and the applicants' apprehension of harm was reasonable, especially given their impending eviction and vulnerability. The balance of convenience favoured granting interim relief, as the inconvenience to the Minister was minimal compared to the potential harm to the applicants. The court held that only an interdict could effectively restrain the threatened conduct. Furthermore, Lt. Col. Gafoor was joined as a respondent to ensure she could...
Court Disposition
Interim interdict granted; rule nisi issued; Lt. Col. Gafoor joined as respondent; costs reserved.
Orders
- Lieutenant Colonel Fatima Gafoor is joined as the seventh respondent in these proceedings.
- A rule nisi is issued calling on any interested party to show cause before Wilson J on 4 June 2025 why the interim orders should not be made final.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment