M.S v P.S (1334/2018) [2023] ZAFSHC 270 (7 July 2023)

M.S v P.S (1334/2018) [2023] ZAFSHC 270 (7 July 2023)

The applicant failed to prove that the respondent's non-payment of maintenance was wilful and in bad faith. The respondent made consistent maintenance payments until July 2022 and tendered R600,000 in settlement of the accrual, believing the calculation was final and binding. Both parties accepted calculations from Mr Weihmann for several years, only disputing his authority after the Legal Practice Council's intervention. The applicant's omission of the settlement offer and payment in her founding papers undermined her case. The Receiver, Joubert, failed to discharge his duties and did not finalise the accrual calculation despite being appointed by court. The acrimonious conduct of both...

Citation
[2023] ZAFSHC 270
Parties
Applicant: M[...] S[...]; Respondent: P[...] S[...]
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
7 July 2023
Case Number
1334/2018
Procedural Posture
Contempt Application / Final Judgment
Outcome
Application for contempt of court dismissed; counter-application dismissed except for suspension of maintenance and directions regarding accrual calculation.
Judges
Naidoo
Legal Topics
Maintenance Obligations, Accrual Calculation, Contempt of Court, Receiver Duties
Family and Children Civil Procedure Maintenance Obligations Accrual Calculation Contempt of Court Receiver Duties

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

M[...] S[...]

Applicant

P[...] S[...]

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Contempt Application / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent is in contempt of the court order regarding maintenance payments.
  2. 2 Whether the accrual calculation of the marital estate has been lawfully finalised.
  3. 3 Whether the maintenance obligations should be suspended pending further proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to prove that the respondent's non-payment of maintenance was wilful and in bad faith. The respondent made consistent maintenance payments until July 2022 and tendered R600,000 in settlement of the accrual, believing the calculation was final and binding. Both parties accepted calculations from Mr Weihmann for several years, only disputing his authority after the Legal Practice Council's intervention. The applicant's omission of the settlement offer and payment in her founding papers undermined her case. The Receiver, Joubert, failed to discharge his duties and did not finalise the accrual calculation despite being appointed by court. The acrimonious conduct of both...

Court Disposition

Application for contempt of court dismissed; counter-application dismissed except for suspension of maintenance and directions regarding accrual calculation.

Orders

  • The application to declare the respondent in contempt of court is dismissed.
  • The counter-application is dismissed, except that the respondent's maintenance obligations under the Deed of Settlement are suspended pending the outcome of proceedings in the Maintenance Court.